Monday, September 24, 2007

Removing the Debris

I will make this post short---even MRAs will disagree with me on this stance, of which I have respected. But I'm going to do it, anyway, since I'm not against preemptive strikes. I'm sure gender feminists thought was a "bitter nice guy" and bought into that internet stereotype. You are vastly incorrect---I'm a man that puts up with no shit in my sphere. This is the lions' den, and I am the master of the beasts.

Any feminist who comments here will have to resort to curtailing any argumentum ad hominem style fronts or personal attacks. You are only allowed to respond if I desire. It's harsh, even to many of the men who are critical of feminist polemic and myths. But for the gender feminists who still hold their precious notions of how white, young, middle to upper class women are so downtrodden as opposed to us men and feel a masochistic need to blither away, go elsewhere. The scathing comments will be deleted without fanfare---you are not looking for an honest debate, but a personal battle. You will not find that at all. The possibility of being banned permanently is always looming. Do not commit the above error or you are gone. End of discussion. Expression on this blog is earned through merit, and nothing else.


This is my one and only warning on this post, until I get around to a troll rules of sorts.

Sunday, September 23, 2007

SR is Back with the Hammer of Thor

I often get some flak from those who believe I'm too cynical and critical of women's behavior. Well, I've never made it secret that I realize that not every woman is copy cat of each other, what is troubling is that so many women are similar to what I describe, with the inner workings. I understand also, while women are women, that cultural factors aren't exempt from determination or manifestation of character. They make choices. And often bad ones. I don't say, "but there are exceptions" as a disclaimer to prevent my detractors from branding me as a misogynist. They usually will, anyway, and while there are women taking other women to task for their greed, slutdom, lunacy, and irresponsibility, I'm not becoming all flowers and light simply because the latter exist. They are not traitors to their gender, but exposing the fact that the Empress Wears No Clothes, and unfortunately, women's word is still given more credibility than men's. Because, ya know, you're sexist even if you point out bad girl behavior. Or something like that.

Here's something I wrote on a private forum that I believe bears merit.

The idea that men "think with their dicks" is a true self-projection from women if there was one. Women's intrinsic power comes from their generative force, giving birth, and their hormonal landscape is one cell of imprisonment they can't escape, at least until after menopause. This is one reason why reproductive choice is a crucial feature of feminists and feminism as well as traditional women; it is the one trump card in dealings with Western men; all but the most blocked-headed of women who somehow know this on some level, and will never completely yield or submit this power to men.


This is also why women often withdraw their own sexual desire for men---to admit they have a primal attraction to give pleasure to men is designated by modern women as a sign of weakness, and by doing the former, women lead men on to "prove" themselves, i.e. exploit them. This is why "pure" slutdom is considered bad and done behind closed doors, indirect forms of prostitution---although we dare not call them whores, which would be calling a spade a spade, is "good" as long as nobody states the obvious and sugarcoats it.

The notion that women are more moral than men is complete and utter rubbish. I can't tell you how many times I've listened to women in the past---when I actually bothered---talk about their kids, their clothes, their boobs, their asses, the kinds of sex they've had, diets, hairstyles, their sex life/adventures, their husbands and boyfriends (often described in sitcom and bumbling terms), their boobs, their asses, their purses, their clothes, their boobs . . .

-Look at the self-"improvement" books out there for women.
-Glance over the diet and fashion magazines tailor made for women, and the repeated subjects therein.
-Witness their behavior in clubs and the meat market.

See a pattern here?

Yet women, presently, fight ever against themselves, each other, and men in order to appear as "strong and independent womyn" by flashing their sexuality for the world to see and play childish (and potentially dangerous, to sociopaths who've caught that attention) of hide n' go seek---by placing an arbitrary dilemma of sorts out on the table, only a few select men can breach the gap unscathed---those 20% of men who have little problems with women flocking to them. If the "wrong" man approaches their amped up desire to attract men (which has been embellished because women's personalities, in the inverse, have become more toxic) they get mocked, derided among friends, rejected, or worse, pressed with charges of harassment, stalking and assault.

The distinction of the prideful slut and the hypocritical slut is one of a myriad of reasons why my trust for women generally has bottomed out. A woman who wears many masks and uses her sexuality to manipulate, bargain, punish, and castigate while advertising her wares and assets doesn't have honor on any level whatsoever. My rule of thumb with women, without having to list a medium-sized catalog of red flags is fundamental: if you can't trust a woman with sex, you cannot trust her with anything. Her sexuality is a continuum in the parameters (or lack of) in her life; it permeates everything.

American women, in their lie to deceive themselves to escape nature, even their own, cannot master nature because they deny their own affliction with Pagan earth. By emitting sexual noise that is deafening to men and then penalizing men's desire by giving off hollow signals, they draw long term alienation and resentment from the only men that could elevate them from their self-imposed dichotomies.


And, as much as New Age/feminist minded groups will claim otherwise, it has been pretty much men and their inventions and support of technological life and advances that has raised us out of living in those "grass huts" controversial writer and professor Camile Paglia as been quoted about, perhaps one of the few truly honest and brazen thinking "anti-feminist" feminist out there.

Sunday, September 9, 2007

David's Bachelor Guide

I've linked to Dave's myspace page here, but for those wishing to either get some solid grounding for dealing with women, if you still are actively doing so and not shunning them for all the misery they may caused you in every capacity, here it is. I realize there exists some exceptions, but for the most part it's a good list to re-acquaint yourself with on occasion. If it mimics Tom Leykis a bit, that's not a bad thing---oddly enough, I echoed some of Tom's sentiments myself before I knew who he was in the beginning.

Here it goes, enjoy!


ok guys i made a decent sized list of things men should follow to live the bachelor life effectively, it isnt totally complete or perfected yet but here is a list i compiled check it out and tell me what you think


1.Never pay more then 20 bucks on a first date, ideally 15 or less
2.Don’t date, live with or marry a single moms
3.If a jumpoff gets knocked up and extorts you for child support leave the country
4.Always wear protection and get a vasectomy if you can
5.Never marry
6.Never buy a woman diamond rings or any jewelry or gifts, if you do make damn sure she will give you the cash equivalent of what you spent on her. Ideally be a cheapskate use coupons on dinners, drinks, small gifts, etc
7.Don’t deal with femnazis
8.Flush condoms down the toilet every time
9.Use a condom everytime
10.Don’t move in with or have a woman move in with you, no cohabitation , if you have to get a cohabitation agreement
11.If you meet up with a bootycall make sure you are going to get laid
12.Internet jumpoffs you want to meet asap, if need be meet them once to see if they are who they are and are attractive to you, etc and then bang them the next meeting, no questions asked.
13.Don’t have kids
14.Never let a woman or anyone have access to your money, keys to your place or your personal belongings
15.Invite females to your place only as guests , don’t have them stay over for any length of time
16.Don’t give up who you are or what you want to do for a female
17.Give your number to as many females as possible and have them call you when you want them to, get their number as well
18.Be confident, bold and upfront with women, don’t listen to what they say they like, boldness and assertiveness turns them on, being an asshole helps as well
19.Don’t date or try to hookup with a coworker or a woman at your college, big legal nightmares trust me
20.Don’t date seriously until you are where you want to be professionally, financially and mentally
21.Advise your friends about the bachelor life
22.Don’t let a woman feminize anything about you or your belongings, many women try to see if they can change or pussy whip a guy. Never change for her, be who you are
23.Always work to better and improve yourself, financially and education wise, the more money and power you have the more likely you will attract hotter women, but don’t throw your money at them.
24.Avoid psycho women and females with criminal records , especially watch out for women who have been charged with abuse or have abused guys before
25.Go for the chicks that will give it up the easiest, multiple tats, piercings, slutty clothing, etc are some good signs as well as ones with low self esteem or need for attention
26.Be careful of beautiful women that approach you and seem very interested in you right away, usually they have ulterior motives, many times they want something from you, money , favors, etc just say no to them.
27.Watch out for women with lots of emotional baggage they may look at you to try to save them, don’t do it, just bang them
28.Steer clear of gold diggers and entitled selfish women
29.Set up a black book for your booty call list
30.Avoid women who are drunk , if you sleep with them they may accuse you of rape, same as women who change their minds in the middle of sex, just get up and leave
31.Avoid women who want to just “talk& get to know you” you aren’t there for that you are there to get laid, make it clear to them
32.If you date a woman make sure they pay their half of the dating expenses at all times
33.Avoid married women their husbands may try to kill you, etc mess with single women only, and if they have boyfriends get their number anyways and call them every 6 months or so to see if they are single
34.Never allow a woman or anyone to disrespect you in any way always call them out on their crap, women like to test men but get turned on when they are called out on their BS
35.Be mysterious don’t let women know everything about you, the more they know they more they can hurt you, use your and exploit you. Don’t let that happen.
36.Don’t give her access to anything you have, don’t let a lot of women or any female know where you live or your home number, many psycho women have done horrible things to men and their belongings just because they can. Give them your cell phone number only.
37.Don’t talk all day long to women you have to be more of a challenge, say as little as possible, and give as little of effort to get laid, try to get it in the least amount of time as possible. Women know if they want to sleep with a guy very quickly the more you wait the less likely you will get it.

Tuesday, August 28, 2007

ChristianJ's broadcast on AntiMisandry

Damn right, I'm spreading the word. Look forward to more of this, from ChristianJ and others.


http://antimisandry.com/98christianj-on-misandry

Wednesday, August 22, 2007

The Witch and The Priest

Roughly a year ago, Mary Winkler decided she had received enough abuse from her oral accounts, and allegedly had a heated argument with her preacher husband where the shotgun she held, on accident, went off.

Never mind that the wound itself was indicative of a premeditated murder against Matthew Winkler, and despite claims of past abuse, including sexual acts that she didn't like, Mary was not in the midst of struggle defending herself in a life or death situation. Never mind that the day Mary Winkler shot him, they both were supposed to have a meeting at a bank, whereupon Matthew would discover Winkler was involved in scams including bank fraud and wire fraud. This included cashing counterfeit checks in her name and her husband's, that he had not previously known.

I don't know if Matthew truly 'abused' Mary or not, but it seems remarkable that friends, religious associates, and family members declared otherwise. And regardless of motive, if Mary had been a man committing the same crime with a wife, it would have been considered an act of a fiend or a coward. But Mary is now free after only serving seven months, and although she is in a custody battle with Matthew's parents over the children, they are now without a father, and have a murderess for a mother. I don't even want to imagine what it's going to be like for them now that this tragedy has occurred.

The story of Matt and Mary Winkler is very telling---the defense of a battered/abused woman, sans proof, is still utilized as justifiable homicide, and in the eyes of gynocentric laws in our Western culture, women still can receive a slap on the wrist. When men do the same exact thing, they are usually nailed to the wall. As much as feminists' outright lie about that women receive harsher penalties for the any crime, the results indicate something quite different. Over the years, we have been exposed to more and more of these articles keep revealing the universal push that we're somehow supposed to swallow like a jagged, bitter pill: women who kill men do it out of reaction to systematic punishment and humiliation because of patriarchal oppression and malevolent men, and men who kill their spouses are, well, still evil men who wield the proverbial sword of that perceived cruel domination over victimized women.

Remember, that Winkler's sentence was to be a maximum of three years.

Occasionally, a modicum of sense prevails. Years ago Susan Wright claimed the same abuse card, and performed her own style of premeditated murder with a Basic Instinct style twist: she lured her husband, Jeff, into a rather kinky sex act, and while tied up, eventually stabbed him nearly 200 times. The jury was, at first, almost sympathetic towards her crocodile tear tale until the reality of seeing the bloodied bed hit them square in the face: thankfully, they had the impetus to find her guilty, although her conviction has a clause in it---it's not for life, and in thirteen years she is up for parole. If a man had sadistically killed a woman in the same manner, he'd never see the light of day if he didn't qualify for the death sentence in that particular state.

There's a lot more I could add, but I'll leave readers with these thoughts---until we, if ever, hold women just as accountable as men for their actions, for better or ill, our society with continue to sag under the weight of giving guilty women license for brutal crimes, while men are still ever-carrying the burdens of it on their backs. When more and more men continue to wake up about the disparities of injustice towards them and its inherent hypocrisies, those who don't politically protest may get so disgusted that social obligation will sound like a hallow concept rife with the toxins of exploitation. They will rebel by not giving credence to women, not helping them, and walking away.

The hideous irony of feminism is clear: when women win over men, ultimately, they lose. When will they realize that harming men only can continue to backfire?

Much has been said about the "disappearance" of men in many avenues, but no fact is so disheartening to find that men's lives are considered second rate---or worse---than American women's. If women want men to participate in the social compact, they will have to accept this challenge, warts and all. How women decide to exalt self-responsibly, I do not know. They shouldn't be surprised when Atlas truly shrugs---after all, enforced self-sacrifice, along with the fact that a man's life is viewed as disposable under a woman's whim, that more men are rebelling against the very system that innately devalues them.



Tuesday, July 31, 2007

Still Around, People

Once I'm back from vacation, which is this week, I'm going to come in tackling various themes. And yes, even SR attracts women (including a statuesque vixen that seems curious to indulge my personal hedonism---nope, she's not an exotic dancer or escort) despite his detractors labeling him as misogynist.

Makes you wonder about the respect level towards manginas. I am anything if not honest. Bowing down to women, in order to garner favor, has never been my style. Manginas gather more resentment for seeking approval above personalized standards of conduct.

Tuesday, July 3, 2007

MMA, Detox, MGTOW blogging, Feminism, and other cynical stuff

It's been a puzzling and dismaying couple of weeks. Two bloggers from the UK have almost completely vanished with little fanfare, and those of you already familiar with the MGTOW scene, already know something about the disappearing acts, although I won't go into detail here, except to save the questioning for the private forums for now. I will say godspeed to them if by any off-chance they are reading this, and wish the best.

That being said, although I write here on a semi-regular basis myself, this is far from dead in cyberspace, and I fully intent to continue to probe deeper issues when I can. My MMA training is fine, although right now I've taken some herbal and fiber supplements to flush my system, so pumping iron was placed on the backburner until tomorrow. Alas, I didn't get to see the recent cage matches part of my crew signed up for up close and personal, but even a couple of the guys that lost actually went down fighting, literally. Good show!

A few "evil" thoughts before more next blog post:


-What can feminism do for men? What's in it for men? Even the question has been skewed by feminists to mean even posing the question means its an extension of male entitlement. I counter by stating that men should look out for their own self interests at all times, because feminism will never, and I mean NEVER do it; past, present, or future. Not one bit. Unless you're a male feminist getting a good volume of "female attention" (nudge nudge, wink) and have a salary built on spinning yarns and believing your own self-righteous bullshit.

-What good are women "friends" if they don't do you any good? What purpose does it serve it all they are going to do is act coy, cry for help, bitch about their husbands and kids (in a one-sided tangent that doesn't stop about the same goddamn problems), never give their loyalty in return, provide a shoulder to lean upon? Even a decent blowjob doesn't allay the months upon months of being used as an emotional tampon, only to be discarded when your utility worth is deemed non-existent. And women are supposed to be more loyal than men?

-It is women -- not men -- that are pushing men into non-mongamous trysts, the use of sex workers and therapists, and quiet civil disobedience. It is women who are divorcing men out of boredem. It is women who are committing to the idea of hypergamy versus the reality of committing to hardworking men, after their party years have taken its toll and sleeping with dregs is no longer desirable. Women do not want to share life with men. If they did, they would make a serious effort for it. They want a beta male who has the appearance of an alpha, who ultimately caves in to women's whims and desires, and go to the next man if the former outlives his usefulness---providing she already has more than a toehold in the latter's life.

-Young American women are scared to death with relating to men as global human beings. It means that they would have to treat men as emotional and spiritual equals. It is something they cannot have, and will prove to be their future failing in life.

-Feminism is a tool, a means to an end, for certain women who "pick and choose" between traditionalism and "equality." Their cognitive dissonance doesn't bother them, because they don't spend a wealth of time with self-examination.

-Young women who are harboring a selfish, myopic, short term gain, and stunted system of dealing with men are refusing to see that is already backfiring on them, and they still deny their own complicity because the default mechanism in their psychologies is to blame men wholesale, even completely innocent men they cannot have, because they are resentful they have to "settle."

-Many men realize that a polyamorous approach is more desirable than the financial serfdom of living with a nagging, used up single mother with brats sired with a thug or a nobody, which was the mum's selection in the first place. Only manginas and the desperate seek them out, and even they might rebel if like an abused dog, they get kicked around too much.

-Gossiping skanks believe that the male-bashing they do behind our backs is out of our range. Guess what---we're doing more than eavesdropping, we're figuring out what makes you tick as well, and what we have to do not to get hurt by conspiring female jerks again.

-Many men resent the idea of "woman as leader" not because of her sex, but because her abuse of power. If anything, women politicians that are openly feminist dump more heat on men while allegedly favoring women, all for the sake of furthering their political careers; VAWA, IMBRA, rape shield laws, background checks when seeking foreign brides . . . the list goes on. Their track records have proven them untrustworthy and unfair, caring about their own self-promotion, and they turn a blind eye towards men's rights. Pray those that aren't openly feminist don't have a clandestine ax to grind.

-Too many women are in the upswing of the sport of blaming men, remaining clueless why men are completely sick of their bullshit they spew about how an idea relationship consists of, and what a true family is all about. Single moms are guilty as charged.

-Men, with still too few positive leadership roles coming from forefathers, aren't looking to matriarchal figureheads for several reasons, including the fact women don't want to truly understand men (they already think they do) Instead of providing more respect, nurturing them, mentoring them, and giving insight, they up the ante with guilt and shame, thus continuing the cycle of alienating and turning men off to them. Since they demand social obligation from men as a right, they get weak and and tenuous results because they refuse to uphold any similar conditions in the social compact.