I often get some flak from those who believe I'm too cynical and critical of women's behavior. Well, I've never made it secret that I realize that not every woman is copy cat of each other, what is troubling is that so many women are similar to what I describe, with the inner workings. I understand also, while women are women, that cultural factors aren't exempt from determination or manifestation of character. They make choices. And often bad ones. I don't say, "but there are exceptions" as a disclaimer to prevent my detractors from branding me as a misogynist. They usually will, anyway, and while there are women taking other women to task for their greed, slutdom, lunacy, and irresponsibility, I'm not becoming all flowers and light simply because the latter exist. They are not traitors to their gender, but exposing the fact that the Empress Wears No Clothes, and unfortunately, women's word is still given more credibility than men's. Because, ya know, you're sexist even if you point out bad girl behavior. Or something like that.
Here's something I wrote on a private forum that I believe bears merit.
The idea that men "think with their dicks" is a true self-projection from women if there was one. Women's intrinsic power comes from their generative force, giving birth, and their hormonal landscape is one cell of imprisonment they can't escape, at least until after menopause. This is one reason why reproductive choice is a crucial feature of feminists and feminism as well as traditional women; it is the one trump card in dealings with Western men; all but the most blocked-headed of women who somehow know this on some level, and will never completely yield or submit this power to men.
This is also why women often withdraw their own sexual desire for men---to admit they have a primal attraction to give pleasure to men is designated by modern women as a sign of weakness, and by doing the former, women lead men on to "prove" themselves, i.e. exploit them. This is why "pure" slutdom is considered bad and done behind closed doors, indirect forms of prostitution---although we dare not call them whores, which would be calling a spade a spade, is "good" as long as nobody states the obvious and sugarcoats it.
The notion that women are more moral than men is complete and utter rubbish. I can't tell you how many times I've listened to women in the past---when I actually bothered---talk about their kids, their clothes, their boobs, their asses, the kinds of sex they've had, diets, hairstyles, their sex life/adventures, their husbands and boyfriends (often described in sitcom and bumbling terms), their boobs, their asses, their purses, their clothes, their boobs . . .
-Look at the self-"improvement" books out there for women.
-Glance over the diet and fashion magazines tailor made for women, and the repeated subjects therein.
-Witness their behavior in clubs and the meat market.
See a pattern here?
Yet women, presently, fight ever against themselves, each other, and men in order to appear as "strong and independent womyn" by flashing their sexuality for the world to see and play childish (and potentially dangerous, to sociopaths who've caught that attention) of hide n' go seek---by placing an arbitrary dilemma of sorts out on the table, only a few select men can breach the gap unscathed---those 20% of men who have little problems with women flocking to them. If the "wrong" man approaches their amped up desire to attract men (which has been embellished because women's personalities, in the inverse, have become more toxic) they get mocked, derided among friends, rejected, or worse, pressed with charges of harassment, stalking and assault.
The distinction of the prideful slut and the hypocritical slut is one of a myriad of reasons why my trust for women generally has bottomed out. A woman who wears many masks and uses her sexuality to manipulate, bargain, punish, and castigate while advertising her wares and assets doesn't have honor on any level whatsoever. My rule of thumb with women, without having to list a medium-sized catalog of red flags is fundamental: if you can't trust a woman with sex, you cannot trust her with anything. Her sexuality is a continuum in the parameters (or lack of) in her life; it permeates everything.
American women, in their lie to deceive themselves to escape nature, even their own, cannot master nature because they deny their own affliction with Pagan earth. By emitting sexual noise that is deafening to men and then penalizing men's desire by giving off hollow signals, they draw long term alienation and resentment from the only men that could elevate them from their self-imposed dichotomies.
And, as much as New Age/feminist minded groups will claim otherwise, it has been pretty much men and their inventions and support of technological life and advances that has raised us out of living in those "grass huts" controversial writer and professor Camile Paglia as been quoted about, perhaps one of the few truly honest and brazen thinking "anti-feminist" feminist out there.