tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32936152807941640912024-03-04T23:23:24.394-08:00Feminist ApocalypseAn online commentary, bastion, and ongoing counterstrike against feminism memes, lies, and women firster supporters.Sociopathic Revelationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11208852529333617263noreply@blogger.comBlogger132125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3293615280794164091.post-2504351817288855902016-06-04T08:19:00.002-07:002016-06-04T08:19:56.938-07:00You bet, I'm still around . . <span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">It's been quite a while since my last post, and if anyone thinks I have disappeared, that's not exactly true. I'm still on NG's forum now and again, and I have been keeping watch and living life.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Rest assured, there will be times I will be around again. I'm pleased to see the amount of MGTOW-oriented blogs and videos that have proliferated across the Internet. Let me just say "cheers!" for now to anyone getting this. Perhaps when I do have more time, writing will be an outlet again. There's certain much to say, if anything else. SR </span>Sociopathic Revelationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11208852529333617263noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3293615280794164091.post-44879858959346831362015-09-17T03:31:00.002-07:002015-09-17T03:51:59.621-07:00The MGTOW Manifesto, The Black Pill, and Unveiling the Truth<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">With all the apparent in-fighting in the manosphere and heated differences regarding MGTOW, there has to be something that clears things up.</span><br />
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">On his blog, <a href="https://omegavirginrevolt.wordpress.com/2015/09/12/the-mgtow-manifesto-has-nothing-to-do-with-mgtow/">The Black Pill</a> states:</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">MGTOW happened because of the decisions of many men concerning the nature of women. They made those decisions not because of a document but because they rationally assessed the situation with women. Even the authors of the so called MGTOW manifesto knew this. </span></blockquote>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">One of the salient matters that several people fail to grasp (or don't want to) is that men have adapted and expounded upon MGTOW as a philosophy and a way of being, if you will. I was on Nice Guy's forum when much of the ideas were fleshed out and discussed, and occasionally with heated arguments. I was there online with Ragnar, Zed, arthur, alonso, JadedGuy, Teflon, Alpha, Mechanized, Kevin Biomech, and a host of others were in the fray for the first few years. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">I find it funny how there are those who damn us as "hating women" since many of us dared to question and discuss the real meaning of gynocentric behavior. Perhaps this truly frightens and dismays the manosphere detractors (although they will not admit to such emotions), and that is part of the reason why we have seen anyone like Esmay and others lash out at us as hatemongers and cultish. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">We are exposing these truths, and it is not always pretty or fits with their deluded sense of how the dynamic of the sexes really is in life. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Even on NG's site, sadly, much of the <i>resistance</i> of understanding gynocentric culture came from the posters who still had "Let's go back to the 1950s!" mindset, or the idea that feminism was a corrupting influence . . . rather than the fact that women latched on to feminism because of its benefits and using it to mask highly selfish and destructive motivations. <i> Feminism is another outgrowth of gynocentric behavior</i>, as an ideology institutionalized and media saturated norm.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">One of several faults of the tradcon manosphere posters (currently) is that they are caught up into taking the manifesto literally. The subjects of the marriage strike, hypergamy, Briffault's law, hypoagency, as well as misandric factors in society such as the legal climate and negative social attitudes towards men were often issues back then as well as now. The manifesto was skeletal guide, and men are left with the choice to live their lives and adopt to their personal reality as they see fit. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Simply because the marriage strike was not mentioned does not negate the paramount importance of the topic, its place in MGTOW, or the effect on women and society. The manosphere that wants to condemn MGTOW or co-opt it is engaged in one or more of the following:</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">-They are in denial of the laws and social norms that are seriously damaging towards men.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">-They do not understand the legalities and the way the system is rigged against them.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">-They believe in their hubris that they can somehow "alpha" their way through it struggles they face in the current state of affairs.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">-They do not think that what happens to other men will happen to them.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">-They are having grave trouble with accepting the dark side of selfish female nature, and that countless women consider men as packmules or disposable. This includes them.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">-They cannot accept that the push to get married places them more in the line fire than not getting married.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">-They are demonizing men that have gone their own way without coming to terms with the gravity of the issues we are facing as men, and we are scapegoated because we have the audacity to speak the truth. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">-They do not want to accept that gynocentricism is deeply embedded in Western culture, and both modern "traditionalism" and feminism are two major aspects of it.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">With all that in mind, let's get back to TBP and more of what he has to say:</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">They came up with the phrase “men going their own way” because they noticed one reason the MRM which was not working was because “men kept going their own way”.</span></blockquote>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Essentially speaking, he is correct. I remember when Zed was actively posting on NG's site, and he remarked that men had an incredible amount of stubbornness even when concerning their own welfare. With all the in-fighting and vehemence involved, even, that's why <i>men going their own way</i> was coined---and attributed to Zed himself. He also mentioned that so many types of men's rights movements---to his dismay---would splinter and fracture. There had to be a better way of men being able to educate, empower, and save themselves. Hence, MGTOW was born from those proverbial waters, if you will.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Anyone still embracing the manosphere misunderstanding (or purposeful misguidance of MGTOW) needs to scan Zed's writings. I think a few are even too stupid to understand them if they read any prose at all (Matt Forney comes to mind, not surprisingly). But many will benefit from them if they are willing to have their eyes opened. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">TBP continues here:</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">The authors of the so called MGTOW Manifesto invented nothing. They only observed a phenomena among men (which if you include monasticism has been going on for centuries), gave it a name, and then tried to use that name to control it. </span></blockquote>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">What MGTOW detractors don't either get (or bitterly resent) is that the acronym is way of codifying a mindset and behavior among men on paper, but there is more to it. It is about men resisting the control and unwarranted yoke of society hefted on them, and discovering their own value as men. It could any other label, but its usage is profound in a way. Throughout history, there have always been men fed up with the treatment they were receiving, and carved their own paths for their sake of their own self interest. This troubles society, feminists, and self-serving parasites, for it throws off the shackles of self-obligation (and the inherent hypocrisy and exploitation of men that comes with it).</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Let's see what TBP caps things off with: </span><br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">They failed at trying to control MGTOW, but since their document exists enemies of MGTOW can use to pull the “I’m not really against MGTOW because the MGTOW Manifesto” scam. Regardless, even the authors of the so called MGTOW Manifesto knew that it had nothing to do with actual MGTOW.</span></blockquote>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">The insidious thing is that there are scam artists and deeply troubled individuals laying claim they are the real deal, but there is a curious side effect; their meltdowns and true colors are being exposed. Part of their spiel is clinging to the fundamental interpretation of the draft of the manifesto without realizing that was merely a spring board for the philosophy. Either that, or they are employing it for selfish ends and causing conflict with other men. MGTOW is also a rational reaction to how a misandric culture treats men, the imbalance of gynocentricism, and taking the reigns away from the female imperative to enable men gain personal power. It seems the recent critics are not terribly happy with that.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Those out to "own" MGTOW and control men have already been met with an iron boot of backlash. There exists more than one reason for this---there are men done with being controlled, done with being scammed, done with being exploited, and done with hacks and hollow gurus spewing horseshit for their own ego and gain. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">The lamentable thing is that feminist and white knights must be having a grand time about all the all-fighting and pissing contests. Still, the jovial online banter from them wouldn't last long, and the reputation of those who want to twist MGTOW for their own nefarious purposes will fail (and probably will scapegoat others, of course, while they fall).</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">This is a shout out to The Black Pill and Zed/Zenpriest. Thank you for inciting me to light the inspirational fires again on my blog. SR</span><br />
<br />Sociopathic Revelationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11208852529333617263noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3293615280794164091.post-92066835338433373452015-08-25T02:14:00.002-07:002015-08-26T01:02:31.013-07:00Howling Mockery At (Certain) Portions of The Manosphere: Exposing the Truth<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">There were dust ups that I generally didn't get involved with too much when they occurred. I did say a basic piece on why I think the detractors of MGTOW were clearly wrong. But I'm back to break things down again to get to the crux of the matter, and state why they are full of crap.</span><br />
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Note many will point out that MGTOW is a part of the manosphere in a general sense. I will not split hairs on this issue, but I will be speaking about the alleged "critics" that seem to think it's not a path for men to travel on. I will discuss those who act as if MGTOW is a cult, a haven for loserdom, or men not living life.</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">They are wrong. As usual.</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">-The most salient point a reader must understand about the barbs thrown at us men is thus: they are rife with hypocrisy from the accuser. It's demonstrative on more than one level, which I will explain further.</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">-The other is that there are forces in the manosphere that want to make a quick buck online, and since men are often suspicious of anyone that will exploit them, PUA snail oil brewers and would be gurus are showing their true colors. Even more so, those same hacks piss on anyone who doesn't fall for their bullshit. As con artists, they are not very good. However, they seem to have amassed a following. It's unfortunate because they will be punished by their own ignorance for siding with the peddlers of bad advice and false hero worship.</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">-Speaking of that hypocrisy I mentioned, much of the griping I've seen stems from projection. Projecting their own failures with obtaining affection with women. The surprising disregard for their own health and well being, including addiction and weight problems. Several of the men that have come for to make a name for themselves look virtually nothing like the next Chris Hemsworth or Tatum Channing, much less have charisma. Several MGTOW have been slammed as neckbeards, and when you see the finger pointers, they have fragile ground to stand on.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Does anyone actually believe someone like Matt Forney can pull in a Jessica Biel look-a-like with his own charms? I would ask you what type of herb you were smoking . . . </span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">--The grandiose sense of self-importance and self-promotion, rather than focusing on the message and application as paramount. I realize there are key figures in men's issues and it's actually a good thing that more voices are speaking up, and recognizable ones as well. It gives a feel of a network of sorts and a personal spin and face on things. However, there are others that want lap dogs to bow down to their arrogant personas while they bestow nothing of real value to men. They are ones to avoid, and they will prey on the gullible all the while extolling how "manly" and "alpha" they are. Which if they have constantly remind everyone of that label, then they are not.</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">-Dissing incels I wanted to do a blog post alone on the subject, but I will say this for now----the jeer of "You can't get laid, ha ha" is by origin a<i> feminized </i>one. Women in our culture have imbalanced power over men through the state and institutions, but it is gradually eroding through many factors (including men waking up and a shoddy economy). Since women's sexuality has been the biggest attribute they have over men---young men particular---the idea that shaming men in this fashion of the <i>you can't get laid </i>has its root source <i>with women</i>. Many men are countering with not marrying or denying women relationships and affection back, or using them for just that---sex. Whether they are "incels" or not, taking back one's personal power is vital to any MGTOW.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">When men in the manosphere slam others for not getting regular sex do this, they are stooping to gutter-level Ameriskank tactics. Period. (And by the way, this is coming from someone who was considered a womanizer in a proverbial past life, if you will).</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">-Gravitating towards a more traditional approach and praising the nuclear family versus the PUA lifestyle. The mansophere "gurus" need to make up their minds on this . . . will you continue to reward skanks with libertine behavior or socially shame them while rewarding loyalty from women? Several people will claim that "gaming" women can lead to a monogamous and healthy relationship. I doubt this is a serious component for long term relationships. </span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">-Wanting to lead men back to the plantation. Several of the ex-PUA gurus and commentators in the manosphere are proffering ideas about getting back to the antiquated notion of their idea about traditionalism. <b>This advice is absolutely insidious, and must be fought with at all costs.</b> Including those who masquerade as "conservative" in nature but are wolves in sheeps' clothing. The pricks involved must think their women-taming tactics will save them from false accusations or having their life ruined. It won't. They are deluded, or they are deliberately leading other men astray. Paul Elam has been one of several, and that's why AVfM has lost trust with so many men after that debacle. There exist people who label themselves as MRAs who have zero interest in helping men whatsoever, but would see them get trampled in the process. </span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Here's what Zed had to say about going back to uh . . . traditionalism:</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Men now must completely destroy marriage. It is too corrupt and too fouled to fix. It is a derelict building which MUST be torn down so that something useful can be built in its place. </span></blockquote>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Does this sound like the shift to pre-1960s ways of dealing with women and family? No. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">And yet certain cocksuckers in the manosphere want men to go back to risk everything they have done for themselves and adapting in a misandric culture to throw themselves back into the dangerous maelstorm itself. Unreal.</span><br />
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">MGTOW offers something more---we are waking up to our own individuality, our own worth, our value as men. It's puzzling that we are dubbed as being just as bad as the feminists, considering that those same lousy detractors engage in similar behavior as those said feminists. If women couldn't bring us completely back the fold, they will not, either.</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
Sociopathic Revelationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11208852529333617263noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3293615280794164091.post-8319727089469596172015-03-27T05:31:00.000-07:002015-03-27T05:49:48.841-07:00Chivalry Sucks (Yes, it does)<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">I have a friend that truly believes being a chivalrous man will give him the upper hand.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">I'm going to school him one evening and tell him that that's essentially bullshit.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">I honestly think he doesn't want to come to terms with how it is for men, the dating scene, and with modern women. He still believes in soul mates and there is an exception out there for him. I'm sure he could stumble on a mythic NAWALT, but chances for him are slim. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">He's truly a good hearted man, and good hearted men get trampled in the maelstrom. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br />The salient reason why they get trampled is that they still want to desperately buy into the fantasy of the golden angel that is their soul mate. Ultimately, when a man enacts chivalry, he is rife for his own servitude. There are women that are more than happy to be the cynosure of that, and coupled with a boundless sense of entitlement of selfishness, exploit men. Financially especially. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">I also found it's exceedingly rare to find a composed woman that doesn't want to <i>throw down</i> once in a while. US women seem to have a fine habit about creating chaos when being reasonable to allay conflict would be more rational. I'm speaking largely of emotional abuse (although this can be physical abuse as well; there is overwhelming evidence that women are often the antagonists in DV, but right now I'll stick to the manipulation here). </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">I did have a relationship with quite a sexy older woman years ago who never did this; we barely got into a heated debate about things we disagreed with, and it was mild. There exist honorable exceptions, but they are not the majority.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">And if you protest and demand equal treatment in a relationship, you are "complicated" as a man and moody. If you draw a line in the sand and put your foot down, you're an asshole. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">But if you concede all the time, you're a pussy. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">It's not easy to "win" with Ameriskanks.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Chivalrous men fail to realize they will constantly be trying to placate a woman who will be happy being unhappy. No relationship is perfect. But incessantly catering someone with a narcissistic complex---coupled with an "you must entertain me or else" injunction---is a tainted relationship from the start. Chivalrous men feel ego gratification from making a woman happy; and if momma ain't never truly happy, well, you know that will be an endless battle to make her content. And she never really will be. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">The mainstream still does not truly acknowledge men are largely the romantic sex. The unfortunate thing is that it can (and will) be used against chivalrous men, and there are women who think nothing of doing that. Including dragging a proverbially broad-sided man through divorce court while sleeping with someone else. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">I asked my friend what a woman would do in turn for all the genteel acts he would perform for her. He never answered online, but once we do meet up at a lounge we occasionally frequent, I'll let him know not only how one sided his approach is, but how it's possibly fraught with pitfalls and peril. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">I doubt if it will sink in until he's ran the gauntlet enough times. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Personally, I rather go my own way than deal with all the heartache. </span>Sociopathic Revelationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11208852529333617263noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3293615280794164091.post-84094065824181384232015-03-23T05:45:00.002-07:002015-03-23T05:55:23.097-07:00Neo Unplugged on "Is MGTOW Feminism for Dudes?" and his response . . .<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">There's been one pretty lame sentiment going around for some time: that MGTOW is the inverse equivalent of feminism for men. I've been saying this (quite a while), that anyone making the charge that MGTOW is another form of feminism---just the sexes reversed---has either no idea what they are talking about, or in serious denial. Neo Unplugged takes that same train of thought to task in his current videos found here:</span><br />
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=phabCk5uW8Y">Is MGTOW Feminism For Dudes?</a></span><br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PnxNhR9SfhY"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">For MGTOW: "Feminist" is the new "Misogynist"</span></a><br />
<br />
<br />
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Enjoy! SR</span></div>
</div>
Sociopathic Revelationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11208852529333617263noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3293615280794164091.post-67863984963161056332015-03-20T04:19:00.000-07:002015-03-20T05:23:19.806-07:00A Post on the schism between MRAs and MGTOWs<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Obviously, this is not directed specifically toward those who are for men's rights and are not trying to actively take MGTOWers to task. For those who wish to keep the peace, I legitimately thank you.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">However, there are others who either believe that MGTOW has toxic elements and men within, or they are acting as if there is among us. It is interesting of note that these same control-mongers adamantly refuse to see their own hypocrisy. They are so enamored with their own arrogance that there is barely any room for anything but <i>their own</i> idea what men should be doing.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Part my own grievance is because of this; they simply refuse leave things alone. They were the ones drawing out the proverbial gunfire, and then calling us losers and assholes for hitting back. There are those (such as the AVfM) that have had critics for a few years now, but it is clear that they if they had been some sort of friends in spirit towards others, it has been become antithetical towards what men are often seeking, and that is <i>self-interest and preservation.</i></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">This is not a good situation.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">I would even gather people like Paul Elam and their ilk have generated a cult of personality about themselves, and despite being supposedly tough, will invariably take any return fire from MGTOWers as "bitterness" even though it is clear they have their own moody turns and refuse to see why they are getting flak against them. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">I wonder what happened with all the apparent attempts to dismantle feminist influence from society. I guess attacking what they perceive as low status men is more important.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">The trouble is we didn't need them in the beginning, and we won't put up with them now. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Clearly, they have done jack fucking shit in the amalgam. They are not helping men as a rule. There are have been a few personal victories for men here and there, but overall, societal changes have not occurred. Many of us have seen how deep the gynocentrism is rooted and how corrupt the system has become, and we've decided to live on our own terms rather than engage with petty bickering online with feminists and their cronies. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> The fact that certain self-labeled MRAs are damning other men with <i>unearned </i>shame and guilt is very telling; they want control over other men and browbeat those same men in silenced submission for pretend sins and transgressions. They want to profit from men's suffering and toil. It's revolting. The audacity is maddening . . . it's no longer surprising, but it's still outrageous. And the idea is no different from the feminists and white knights have done, and those were the ones they slammed in past. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Guess what. The feminists are having a joke at their expense; all the in-fighting gives them a sense of smug, righteous glee. That's what really has been accomplished. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br />That's sad, but that's the way it is right now. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">One hallmarks of feminists also is condemning otherwise good men as suspect, and eventually making enemies of them when they were originally not. There are people claiming to be MRAs that are doing exactly the same thing. We do not need more of this.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">And as I've said, anti-MGTOW detractors have gall to equate us with feminists . . . when we simply wanted to opt out and do our own thing. If refusing to be their lap dogs, praising them, and kissing their asses dubs men as "misogynists," so be it. Would they assist us in our trials and tribulations? The answer to that is an emphatic no. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">We've already determined to go it alone successfully; to hell with their "help" if it doesn't enrich or contribute to our lives. </span><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />Sociopathic Revelationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11208852529333617263noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3293615280794164091.post-85333169813179236082015-03-15T09:08:00.000-07:002015-03-16T05:13:01.965-07:00MGTOW Rising . . . <blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Be careful how you fight evil . . . your weapons can be turned against you.</span></blockquote>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">---(Slightly rephrased quote from a dark film . . . ) </span></blockquote>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">It's been a while since I've spoke up. It's certainly about time.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Much has been said about the rifts occurring with certain MRAs and MGTOWs; there are people who know what the fundamental problems here, but I think a further examination is worth not just repeating, but getting to the crux of the matter.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">There are several people trying to demonize and control those who simply refuse to come back to the plantation. The have much to gain from doing this in the short term, including even money making schemes, ego-boosts, looking like the good guy, and even procuring a following. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Of course, procuring a following with us men that have broken away quite a bit is pretty tough; even though MGTOW has struck a chord with us, we tend to be fairly---if not highly---individualistic. For the so-called appointed leaders in particular MRA and manosphere circles, it is challenge they don't seem to understand. Several are not very convincing with trying to lure men under their own influence, often resorting to the same tired shaming language and unwarranted accusations that both white knight neotrads and feminists employ in order to ensnare men. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">It is obviously doomed to fail. We have already done much to purge our own lives of such manipulative tactics and social toxicity. The problem is that the same would-be designated "alpha" buffoons are seriously shooting themselves in the feet. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">There are have been forces in society, institutions that have lied to us and tried to loot us, and women that have betrayed us on a fundamental level---all the while demanding that we "man up" even when celebrating how they have screwed us over at our expense. They are incessant and malevolent . . . and acted as if it was all our fault. We are no longer interested in getting used and abused anymore, and will remember those who crossed us. Do you honestly think an Elam or a Fidelbogen will garner any allegiance while dumping on MGTOW as "misogynists" as they desperately try to promote themselves? No. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br />The insidious irony is that they have become so much like the antagonists they deplored at length. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">And they have the balls to call us just like feminists. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">But it gets even worse.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">I think a few of them know how difficult is it for men in a clearly misandric culture. It has effected most men on almost every level. Much as been written about the legal system, societal malaise, the demonization of masculinity and male sexuality (including us white heterosexual men), the family courts, and other weighty topics---I won't go in depth here for the moment because it quite vast, but I will say this . . . I am absolutely DISGUSTED at both the men and women who KNOW what men are going through in this era and their pain and struggles, and still want to alienate men, profit from them, claim to help but actually exploit them, and all the while damning us as embittered misogynists. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">The same tired name calling is leveled at men with the Social Justice Warriors with #gamergate and #metalgate. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Sound familiar? </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">You will lose us just like the feminists and the "traditionalists" (i.e. the selfish, lazy women) have. Instead of strengthening your ranks and persuading men to help in their camps, you turning your proverbial weapons on the very men you should be providing the tools to enrich and develop. Those lapdogs, front men, and scapegoats you seek will not be there for you. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">We truly are done. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">With the current rash of doxxing and unfounded slags against men, they are showing their true colors. They are also discovering that those men are not the dunderhead losers they believed, but men who had carved their own paths out for themselves and continue to do so.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> It doesn't matter if a self-proclaimed MRA like Paul Elam, a fraud like Anita Sarkeesian, the Jessica Valenti feminists of the world, or even the religious hacks like Mark Discroll continue to bite the hands that feed. We will refuse to support them for their misandry and we will expose them for who they are. They have the audacity to condemn men while possessing <b>zero bravery</b> to critique Ameriskank behavior whatsoever, a myopic strategy that will backfire. We are not lambs to the slaughter, but lone wolves discovering our own worth and personal power. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">We want to be the masters of our own destiny, and take the steps to secure that truth. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
Sociopathic Revelationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11208852529333617263noreply@blogger.com6tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3293615280794164091.post-46834678702032420482014-11-25T01:51:00.000-08:002014-11-25T01:51:05.549-08:00Pruning The Dead Weight<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">This is a brief post, but it has more the one purpose. I've dumped a few links (in part) since I feel they have been borderline hostile, ignorant, or slamming MGTOW philosophy while demonizing anyone who is sympathetic to it. The irony is that the detractors I have read typically are characterizing MGTOW as the flip side of feminism, and it is anything but that ideology and nothing as destructive and certainly not misandrist. We are not an organized movement or a cult, and we will not yield to the unhealthy toxic consensus or self-appointed figureheads that would lead us astray; we are individuals engaging in self-determination and do what is best for <i>our</i> lives, regardless of what the state, feminists, white knights, politicians, and their sycophants declare otherwise. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">The irony is that the current crop of barbs directed against it is very little different from feminist shamming. As if that will change anything---it will only convince anyone who is already fed up with the proverbial slings and arrows they have received over time that the continued push against men has to be curtailed, and solidifies our own positions. The fact of the matter is that MGTOW ideas have gotten bigger than people can dismiss now, and will have some very, very intriguing ramifications in the years to come.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">That being said, anyone who is MGTOW friendly (even if just in spirit), let me know if you want to add you as a link I will most certainly consider it. SR</span>Sociopathic Revelationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11208852529333617263noreply@blogger.com6tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3293615280794164091.post-87860208008025572492014-08-29T01:25:00.001-07:002014-08-29T01:25:15.339-07:00Sandman on "Too Little, Too Late"<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Sandman has been quite the powerhouse of sorts recently, and I wanted to share one of many videos to both newcomers and the old guard. Without further ado, enjoy . . . SR:</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cPhg6NUuDv0">Too Little, Too Late</a></span><br />
<br />
<br />Sociopathic Revelationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11208852529333617263noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3293615280794164091.post-26825248251601158492014-03-21T02:45:00.000-07:002014-03-21T02:50:39.302-07:00Women Are Their Own Worst Enemies<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Many years ago my own sister went through a series of pretty rocky relationships, a near fatal overuse of both prescription and illegal drugs, and eventually married an man that was her rough equivalent---they were both emotionally and physically abusive. While that marrage would not last and eventually she would evolve into someone that would much different from the addictive and moody young woman she was, her past lifestyle could have ruined or even killed her. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;">Looking back, I always wondered why she had engaged in such reckless, antagonistic, and foolish behavior. And why she even did it the first place. What the hell was wrong with her? People generally liked her when was growing up, and she certainly didn't face the problems I did. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;">It would be easy to chalk it up to low self esteem, but it doesn't solve the puzzle. On occasion, she would blame it on the idea that she had been someone raised to garner favor with others and place her needs on the backseat. That doesn't illuminate much. If anything, her forays into a descent with mindless hedonism and petty associations were often done as if in defiance of anything and everything, including what was good for herself. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;">Even more troubling was that she lashed out to those who cared about her and would help her, even to the point where I was going to completely give up. When she believed I would withdrawal completely, it was a surprise. There was always someone could rely on for support. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;">There was a period where she finally pushed me too far, and I thought that not even a modicum of understanding and care was present in her left, but I had to be the unconditional crutch in a way. Her hypocrisy made me furious. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;">Losing her brother---perhaps forever---was unthinkable, and her behavior didn't always get better until she truly realized it may have been for good.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;">Yeah, that's how bad it got. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;">One might think her transformation from her past self to now was remarkable, but it took many years for her to become someone successful in some fashion, healthy again, and deeply motivated to improve on herself and her world. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;">In my youth, it would puzzle me why so many women would go through such a hellish gauntlet. For the longest time, very few every questioned if it was <em>women themselves </em>that were ultimately making piss poor choices in life, and not their final responsibility for bad judgment and decision making. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;"><br />We've heard the feminist narrative a thousand times. It's misogyny in our culture. Patriachy. Oppression of women. <em>Ad nauseam.</em><br />
<em></em><br />
And if you are feminist or not, the convienent scapegoat for your problems can always be men. <br />
<br />
</span><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">For example look at the ones lamenting that there are not enough "alphas" out there for marital bliss. They will explain all the good men are taken. This is to mask their own failures at obtain a decent man, or their own insecuries and shortcomings. Or for having sex and dating men that are toxic to them. Or pushing good men away and treating them like dog shit. That's to insure it is not their fault, feel smug and self-righteous<em> even if they know inwardly, there's a chance it just might be their own doing.</em></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;">God forbid they are the ones being rejected, and that they would have to be forced to look into the mirror with a hard gaze at who the problem <em>really</em> is. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;">Even the women at the bottom---regardless of how much self-loathing they possess---still act as if they have some innate value because they are women. And men have to measure up no matter what. What women generally damn and peg as "average Joes" have to struggle endlessly to date and mate in the sexual arena . . . even though those same men would make suitable boyfriends, husbands, and fathers.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;">There's even quite a few people in the manosphere that will shift the blame entirely on men; "You weren't man enough" they will sneer, even though much of the bulk of Western society has become rigged against men so badly one must wonder why men bother with defending cultural norms and institutions to begin with---much less try to garner favor with women beyond obtaining sex. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;">My sister happend to pull herself out of her self-destructiveness and even made amends (if painfully slow) with me and my parents. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;">Note that if I was willing to sever ties permanently with a blood relative forever, imagine how American women who would try to pull Ameriskank behavior would fare. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;">Not very long.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;">And there are more men like me out there as we speak. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;">Not every woman recreates herself. Instead, what we have is a vast wasteland of women who reach a certain age---<em>if </em>they reach that age---who are looking for a beta male provider they can sucker into supporting them in a guilt-ridden manner. And for every woman who actually doesn't ever go through the cycle my sister did and/or becomes successful, charming, health conscious, pretty, and marriage-worthy, we have legions upon legions of broken women littering the US landscape. And while there are white knights and mangina who might still date them, the number of men questioning the evolutionary and societal dynamic between the sexes are growing. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;">And we are sick of the raw deal we have had from day one. Eventually, things will have to change. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;">I do think women are quite capable of waking up to the fact they have not only ruined the underlying compact between the sexes, but they have become their own worst enemy in the process. If they are willing to do so is another question entirely. And it typically comes with a hefty price, and sometimes that reflection in the mirror is almost too mortifying to behold. But if that's what it takes, so be it.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;"></span><br />Sociopathic Revelationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11208852529333617263noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3293615280794164091.post-15756349917649485642013-11-22T03:24:00.001-08:002013-11-22T03:46:57.736-08:00The Sword of SR Cutting into the Heart of the Night; Taking on Terri Trespricio<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">It's been months since I viewed Terri Trespicio's <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TlGnmcBfM7o"><i>If You Can't Beat Them, Join Them</i></a> as well as the accompanying video blog post <a href="http://territrespicio.com/how-feminism-fd-up-my-love-life"><i>Feminism Fucked Up My Dating Life</i></a>, but since I rarely take someone to task, I feel that it's about time. It's not merely for the sake of it, either; readers will know that I am reticent about spotlighting individuals not because of apprehension, but because I think it serves little purpose to engage in petty Internet wars. It obscures the issues, although I have come to admit some times it's important to see what makes certain figures tick---and how it relates to men, women, and more pressing matters.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">Apparently, Trespicio did not like Suzanne Venker's article <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/11/24/war-on-men/"><i>The War On Men</i></a>, particularly how she felt it went too far for stating it was women's fault that they deign there are no marriageable men or ones suitable for partnership---and contributing to that situation. While she seems to act like she is admitting her own need to "win" when it comes to men and was driven to prove that she didn't need one in her life---and it could have contributed to her problems with men, I find that there's some more going on here that she won't focus on completely.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">Venker states in the article:</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">Contrary to what feminists like Hanna Rosin, author of The End of Men, say, the so-called rise of women has not threatened men.<b> It has pissed them off. </b>It has also undermined their ability to become self-sufficient in the hopes of someday supporting a family. <i>Men want to love women, not compete with them.</i> They want to provide for and protect their families – it’s in their DNA. But modern women won’t let them.</span></blockquote>
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">Emphasis mine.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">While I'll be the first to say that I have no attention of marriage and children (as my relatives seem to be pretty active in procreating on both sides of my family, if anyone is wondering), I knew pretty much what I wanted with a woman even in my late teens. As the years passed, there are many things about the blatant misandry I endured that has made me fed up, even to the point I truly<b> hate</b> dating, but one thing is clear---Venker is correct that most men want to love women, not fight or compete with them. And as I mentioned to the mighty Zed/Zedpriest himself holds true for modern women---women, on the other hand, don't want to be harmonious with men; they want to compete, bully, and bulldoze us. And even take a sadistic pride in it.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">It seems Terri was in august company with such women. My, my . . . </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">And, of course, if we stand up for ourselves in the face of mistreatment, we are misogynistic assholes. But if we "man up" and take a bit too much, we are push overs and "intimidated." Still, men are reacting and adapting to a culture malaise that has far from ended. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">Terri grew up with when an attitude "that men were basically up to no good, from quite a young age." In her words:</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">I sneered at, and even humiliated men as a teenager, and if a guy liked me, I fairly resented him for it. </span></blockquote>
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">From her own admission, there was always an impulse to prove herself against men and "win" in more than one aspect, even if her own life supposedly suffered because of this. Not that she has my sympathy.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">After all, women pushed for feminism because---you got it---it benefited them, and only benefited a few select men. Whether men were crushed in the ensuing fallout was not important. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">Of course, she credits feminism for largely doing good although it has done incalculable damage to men and the dynamic between men and women (including the white knights, but that's the subject of this post). Feminism has even made things exceedingly difficult for men as myself, who grew up with notions of "egalitarianism" only to find that so many women wanted the license of it and the protection portion of neo-traditionalism if you will, and if men got trampled in the process, well, that was just either their fault or casualties to be expected.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">And we discovered there were women who felt there were superior to us just because of their vaginas. Or were given a rationale to hate us, and if we reacted, we were the "sexists" that didn't deserve a woman. Or they would not take pressing male topics seriously. And treat us less than human beings without an once of guilt until they were held accountable . . .<i> if</i> they were held accountable. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">Men were bad, irrelevant, no good, boorish . . . of course, the gears of modern technology and even civilization would not have advanced to this point without us (and the ones who have procured that are given little credit), but nevermind that right now. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">There's no question about it. Terri equated femininity---or at least what she perceived as pre-feminist behavior of it---as weak. It's an undercurrent in her video when she states "I believe there is a real strength in feminine power, and we're still trying to figure out what that is." Her idea of ingraining masculine code in herself was to win even if it meant rejecting and shaming men. She internalized the darker part of what she viewed men were doing, nevermind the good in us or what we did.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">Just like countless women also made a choice to do.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">Let me tell Terri right now what isn't going to work---and why. It may just take nearly her entire lifetime to sink in, and I'm not being facetious whatsoever. Not beating men at their own game is only a part of it; in fact, I am having a hard time believing that Terri is "better" than most of the men she comes across; I'm wondering what <i>that</i> is specifically. Yes, I'm quite serious. Especially considering the average woman out there sports the mentality that she, and her sexuality, is of more import and value than men <i>by default</i>. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">And also, how is she going to undo all those years of how she mistreated and viewed men? I mean . .. really?</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">Usually women that have an axe to grind against men and constantly have to prove themselves don't often do this by merit alone. Well-rounded, truly developed women don't constantly have to demonstrate how powerful they are to men by fighting with them incessantly---surprisingly---a few of them realize it is no small feat to get to that point without having some grounding in reality. And realizing that alliances with men are crucial. Unfortunately, this woman is so rare now that one could not blame men for believing they don't even exist anymore.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">The ersatz "strong, independent" ball-busting woman who claims to be such often has her power by proxy. Or making sure that HR gets a man to behave to the point where his very job is on the line if he doesn't have the approval of a "superior" that doesn't like him because he physically reminds her of her ex, and she wants to get back at him through that employee. Or it's done with such a know-it-all, towering arrogance that it's a turn off to does around her, and this includes men that might even be open to a relationship. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">No, men like me are not threatened. We are simply done with all the bullshit. And we are wondering if we are being sold a bill of goods again . . . that this time we're aren't buying. And this will continue until things really change for us, or society falls through its ass.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">Let me ask you, Terri, if you are reading this---if you were a man, would you blindly support a society that actively takes from you and barely gives back---or worse---punishes you for simply doing masculine things and still demands you to "act like a man?" And more over, expect you to actually enjoy being used up without protest? </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">I don't think so. I have two words for this: Fuck that.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">The fact of the matter is that there is a war on men that has been waging for a quite some time, and regardless of what shallow features Terri presents on her blog does nothing to diminish that notion. She may have poured a little incendiary fluid to the already destructive inferno that was already raging before her, but the damage has been done. There are men that have gotten to the phase in their lives where offering an olive branch is a laughable prospect. It is only to get burned by this proverbial fire again, and have hordes of feminists, white knights, politicians, and their cohorts continue to give men a raw deal without addressing our concerns . . . and continue to tell men it's all our fault.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">Dr. Helen Smith was certainly on to something when she mentioned about <i>going Galt</i>, including that men's real concerns were not being heeded so much that even some men had resorted to the extreme of suicide out of hopeless and complete desperation; when society stops listening to men, <i>men start doing their own thing despite the incredible tide of anti-male hate against them.</i> It's reactive for some men, adaptive for quite a few, and even proactive/positive for others to do so. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">Men have been telling you people what we really need. <b> And you people still refuse to listen, and it's going to be pretty bad karma.</b></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">Again, I'm going to address Terri Trespicio here; that's the way men are, Terri---in times that are dire or bleak, even we eventually have to find a way for ourselves. You can sit there smug in your own bubble contemplating dating, hook up culture, recipes, and whatever strikes your fancy. As much as you loathed men in the past and pretended to be better than the bulk of us, we are busting our asses in a world that would soon discard us if we were not there for utility purposes. And many of us are painfully aware of that fact, and we don't like it. Not one bit. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">And Terri, you were part of the problem.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">Yes, you were. And I don't think you'll be helping any of us any time soon. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">Was Venker's article so upsetting to you? Perhaps it did hit a nerve, but you don't want to completely accept the charge that there are less and less marriageable men <i>because you . . . with so many other women like you . . . aided in conditions that made it so? Or that men see what you are in spite of the strong image and decide to look elsewhere for real love?</i></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">Whether or not you are along for the ride and decide to join us instead of clobbering us may be even considered useless to those who have ghosted. Eventually, you---and many, many women that are sharing the same sentiment, have worn out the welcome. And if men do decide to engage women, they are resorting to others that may not be as hostile and even appreciate what they do and are as human beings; foreign women, minority women, FWBs, truly feminine women, and what have you. And others have decided to opt out . . . and they are not coming back.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">That should completely terrify you, but you will place a tough-girl facade on with the pretense that you can live without men.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">Be careful what you wish for. </span><br />
<br />Sociopathic Revelationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11208852529333617263noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3293615280794164091.post-65468875958829796242013-08-17T02:05:00.000-07:002013-08-17T02:07:46.881-07:00Myself and Obbop On Discussing Alleged Ameriskank "Generosity" And Selflessness<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">From a MGTOW forum recently:</span><br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"> Obbop;</span></blockquote>
<blockquote>
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">I believe females tend to be more materialistic and greedy... feathering their own nest before considering others.<br /><br />Perhaps
a thought about the recent post mentioning yet another MALE fire
fighter that died helping others and my comment about the lack of
females volunteering to assist their community and others at a risk to
themselves.<br /><br />I will be hard to convince that females have more empathy for others than males do.</span></blockquote>
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br /><br />Men
are far more prone to engage in self-sacrifice than women do as a given
rule, and that's on practically every level. If there's a story about a
woman saving someone <b class="bbc">that is unknown to her at the risk of her very life</b>, I'd like to hear it. I'm sure it has happened but I'm at a loss of reading about a news event like that lately.<br /><br />As
a contrast, men have done this in Western culture throughout time, and
not just for their own wives/offspring. Hell, there are women who claim
that they will fight to the death for their children, but considering
how many mistreat their own kids, I have to give pause. Of course, you
can't tell them that they are shitty mothers or that they are still
extremely selfish; watch the fury come close to the surface if you dare
question it.<br /><br />As far as lending money, even on my own experiences
(when I did date) there were very few women that felt like they should
contribute, or just were flat broke at the end of the month. I'd see
women that would complain how an ex-boyfriend or ex-husband would ride
on their coattails, and when they had got to me there was a chip on
their shoulder. Suddenly, they wanted a man to pay up, simply put. The
Gods only know how many women I went through like that---I figured if
they were not lying about how allegedly generous they were with a
partner (and they probably <i class="bbc">were</i> lying on some aspect), and would shunt all the resentment on me, I'd dump them.<br /><br />And women philanthropists? That's got to be an oxymoron. Seriously.</span><br />
<div class="citation">
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Obbop;</span></div>
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote built">
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">Perhaps
a few individual females possess traits conducive to societal
improvement but I believe most will be too busy squawking on their cell
phones or staring at the sales rack in the mall to concern themselves
with much more than meeting their own wants, desires and hedonistic
lusts.</span></blockquote>
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br />If more men dare wake up and realize how
Ameriskanks are egocentric and selfish to the core---and what they truly
think about men---you just might see more incidents like Costa
Concordia accident manifest, and women forced to help themselves no
matter what. Hell, if you even glance over personal ads out of boredom
some time, you can see them getting more angry out of desperation for
men to pick up the pieces of their broken lives and bad choices.</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">(Note: We were in a discussion about an article that can be found here: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/21/opinion/sunday/why-men-need-women.html?pagewanted=all&src=ISMR_AP_LO_MST_FB&_r=0">http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/21/opinion/sunday/why-men-need-women.html?pagewanted=all&src=ISMR_AP_LO_MST_FB&_r=0)</a> </span>Sociopathic Revelationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11208852529333617263noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3293615280794164091.post-36451812082494159452013-08-17T00:54:00.002-07:002013-08-17T00:54:50.128-07:00Andy Man On MGTOW<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">Enjoy!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RQ1Ix4tR1AM">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RQ1Ix4tR1AM</a></span>Sociopathic Revelationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11208852529333617263noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3293615280794164091.post-42314727041624793692013-07-14T03:24:00.000-07:002013-07-14T03:24:18.716-07:00Newer Comments Sent Through<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Sorry if I have not been updating as of late---I have been extremely busy with work and my downtime consists of getting to the gym when I can and going to submission fighting practice. No matter. I let even a few weighty ones through just for discussion's sake. Note my big two rules are no promoting violence for violence's sake, or feminists using this a playground for slagging men when they feel like it. I don't believe in laundry list of points to bring up, but rather than dwell on the subject I figured I would like everyone know I'm still very much around and itching to write more. Until then, I will post a couple of recent items from other MGTOW and go from there. SR</span>Sociopathic Revelationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11208852529333617263noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3293615280794164091.post-47724088367629081312013-03-21T04:29:00.002-07:002013-03-21T04:29:43.327-07:00Just A Few Thoughts About How Women Think of Nice Guys . . . <span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><a href="http://stonerwithaboner.wordpress.com/">stonerwithaboner</a> had snatched a quote from <a href="http://www.feministcritics.org/blog/">Feminist Critics</a> that he liked, so I'll repeat it here with some commentary:</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<blockquote>
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">The problem is that the Nice Guy is the target of a
modern witch hunt. The Nice Guy is considered a target, a wounded man
because he dares speak out about his loneliness. Women don’t like that,
and men who are too obsessed with sexual competition, see him as a
target. All the nasty things said about nice guys are nothing but
rationalizations for women having no compassion for emotionally
distressed men, and men following their animal competitive instinct.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">Before we can address the attack on nice guys, first we need to know
what it is based on. It is not based on what women say it is. It is
based on the feeding frenzy instinct, the desire for women to cull men
from the herd to reduce unwanted attention, and for men it is to reduce
competition.</span></blockquote>
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">I think this pretty valid thinking. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">Personally, I'm pretty much done with the nice guy/bad boy terms, but Jacalope is on to something here. A man that values his sense of self and being on more than one level, and has been marginalized wrongly is often stigmatized---or even demonized---for openly lamenting his condition as unfair. Men who are viewed and treated as suspect or not as prized as other men by women are often seen as weak or undesirable despite their attributes. He's someone either to exploit or pass up. The frustrating truth is that this actually compounds the problem; regardless of what people believe, there is a hegemony, a hierarchy of sorts in the dating and mating world, and women who want strict choices who they favor, and they alongside with men who don't want rivals are keen to dump on anyone not considered suitable no matter how good the man really is at heart.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">If women clearly perceived the NG as a full-fledged human being, it would mean they would have to act accordingly---his pleasure and pain, joy and suffering, dreams and nightmares, and happiness and sorrow would be something not to dismiss, and reducing him to second class citizen status or lower would be difficult. Since so many Ameriskanks want to be the ones desired and sit in the driver's seat---even passive aggressively---having to deal with a man normally considered not as up to par as an equal would be a struggle for them. It would mean that their personal power would be on a level playing field with those same men. And it would not be so easy to explain why they throw themselves at "alphas" and yet demand a NG to kow tow to ludicrous demands and moods while still remaining the one with the hands on the proverbial reins. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br />Deep down, it seems that Ameriskanks have little respect, understanding, real passion, or sympathy towards men they want as front men, walking ATMs, workhorses, and whipping boys. The "<i>All the nasty things said about nice guys are nothing but
rationalizations for women having no compassion for emotionally
distressed men </i>. . . " is one the main motivations beyond the febrile rants about "nice guys." Simply put, it's a glib and smug excuse to treat men like shit <i>sans</i> accountability. But don't you dare criticize women for their feelings, wants, expectations, or react to them as a spoiled, would-be princess without a throne and a broken crown. You're just a misogynist if you have the gall. </span><br />
<br />
Sociopathic Revelationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11208852529333617263noreply@blogger.com10tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3293615280794164091.post-45332882097019961612013-03-16T02:58:00.000-07:002013-03-16T03:33:04.071-07:00The Rights of Man On Sites Deemed "Hateful" <br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Symantec has tagged certain MGTOW/MRA sites, and I wish to spread the word about it. I do openly state that this company will never get my business and I will continue to let others know why. I believe this is defamation and do want to inform as much as possible about it. I also will let anyone MGTOW/MRA oriented who wishes to contact me about this issue, they can write me at <a href="mailto:WithoutAMaster@msn.com">WithoutAMaster@msn.com</a> at any time. Please keep in touch. SR</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;">From <a href="http://therightsofman.typepad.co.uk/the_rights_of_man/2013/03/now-official-o2-and-symantec-believe-helping-male-victims-of-domestic-violence-and-sex-abuse-is-hate.html">The Rights of Man</a> site: </span><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Thursday, 14 March 2013<br />NOW OFFICIAL - O2 AND SYMANTEC BELIEVE HELPING MALE VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND SEX ABUSE IS HATEFUL</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">By now most people are aware of the issue of men's rights website being wrongly blocked by Symantec and various mobile phone companies due to them somehow being flagged as "hate sites". I've done further investigations and can exclusively reveal the official response from these companies on this matter. There tends to be a bit of confusion about this issue and so firstly I'll attempt to explain what's going on and tackle some misconceptions.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Which sites are blocked?</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br />I initially identified 48 sites blocked by Symantec/O2 and flagged as "hate sites". The list then grew to 58 as even more were identified. It's fair to say that a majority of key sites critical of feminism and supportive of men's rights are blocked. You can see the full list here.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">What exactly does this mean for the sites concerned?<br />The "hate site" classification means a number of users are denied any access, particularly people accessing the internet in some restaurants, workplaces and via mobile phone networks such as Telefonica/O2. In total Symantec claims 250 million users of the filter worldwide, so it could easily mean a 10% reduction in traffic for mens' rights sites.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">How long has this being going on?<br />It is uncertain as to exactly how long this has been an issue. I became aware of the problem in May 2012 though it appears to have been going on in some cases for at least two years. It must have been happening for a considerable length of time as some of the blocked sites no longer exist.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Hold on, I thought avoiceformen.com had been unblocked and Symantec had backed down?<br />Sadly this is not the case and such a suggestion is based on a false report in the media. Avoiceformen.com was never unblocked at any stage.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">I find this all a bit hard to believe, how can I check a site's classification for myself?<br />There are currently two ways to check whether or not a site has been branded as a "hate site". Users have previously checked a site's status by enabling Norton's DNS service, but a much easier method is O2's url checker.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Other mens' rights activists and even member of the media have had difficulty getting any sort of meaningful response from Symantec so I've taken a different approach and been in touch with O2/Telefonica management. I asked them to classify the blocked websites more appropriately and to stop censoring such content. Eventually I was put in contact with O2's head of complaints, Antony Gibson, and he confirmed that O2 use the same filter service from Symantec, called Rulespace, thus explaining why the two block lists of the two companies are identical.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Mr Gibson liaised with Symantec and informed me they had reviewed the list and decided to reclassify just 2 out of the 47 sites I presented them with. This therefore means the "hate" classification/block officially stands for the bulk of this content (including avoiceformen.com) and is no accident. Mr Gibson explained that O2/Symantec regarded the sites to be at the "low end" of the spectrum in terms of hate and further explained that they were blocked and classed as "hate sites" due to reasons such as showing "aggression" and/or use of the term "anti-feminism"!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Mr Gibson did express some concern about people seeing men's rights sites listed as hate sites and smeared in this way, but O2's solution to our concerns is that they will disable their url checker so no one can see the reason why a site has been blocked. In other words O2 is fairly happy for the issue of human rights for men to be classed as hateful, their only concern is people finding out that they're taking this stance. So, now we have no just a case of censorship and defamation, but a cover up too!</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">To compound matters yet further, many of these sites classified as hateful really are incredibly innocuous and deal with very important issues, many don't even use the term "anti-feminist" either nor contain "aggression". Such a term is so vague and ambiguous as to be completely meaningless, and proves absolutely how the filter is arbitrary and a nonsense and completely open to abuse. More importantly, if O2/Symantec have an issue with the term "anti-feminist", then they are quite blatantly taking an extreme political stance in favour of an ideology. Afterall, there's barely any more "aggressive" way of supporting feminist doctrine than to censor and defame anyone who dares critique or correct it.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">I think this issue really sums up how important the men's' movement is today, not to mention the scale of the challenge facing us. We see countless feminist activists all over the media campaigning against free speech and equality and seeking privileges for women such as subsidised insurance premiums. Feminists make endless sexist comments telling men not to rape and even the host of the world's leading feminist radio programme openly laughs at male victims of domestic abuse. Whilst all this has been going on, and despite spending countless hours on the matter, I've failed with a simple request for companies to stop denying help to male victims of rape and domestic violence. In fact I can't even get these sick companies to remove their "hate site" smear from their classification of these vitally important resources. Perhaps I haven't yet been "aggressive" enough?</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Here's a selection of sites O2/Symantec's insist on keeping in their "hate site" category:</span><br />
<a href="http://dvmen.org/"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">http://dvmen.org</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> - A site in Colorado helping male victims of domestic violence.</span><a href="http://toysoldier.wordpress.com/"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">http://toysoldier.wordpress.com</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> - A blog highlighting the plight of male victims of rape and abuse.</span><a href="http://www.ncfm.org/"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">http://www.ncfm.org</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> -Website of the longest running men's human rights organisation in the US (founded in 1977).</span><a href="http://www.fathersforlife.org/"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">http://www.fathersforlife.org</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> - A site seeking for fathers to have a greater role in their children's lives.</span><a href="http://www.debunker.com/patriarchy.html"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">http://www.debunker.com/patriarchy.html</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> - A webpage scientifically debunking the most common feminist myths.</span><a href="http://disenfranchisedfather.blogspot.co.uk/"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">http://disenfranchisedfather.blogspot.co.uk</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> - blog by a fahter who doesnt' get to see his son.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">For those who are curious, apparently the only two non-"hateful" men's sites out of the 47 are: Hisside.com and dadi.org and both are now unblocked.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">by John Kimble</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">The following may or may not be the email addresses of the O2 board members:</span><br />
<a href="mailto:Matthew.Kay@o2.com"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Matthew.Kay@o2.com</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">, </span><a href="mailto:Pilar.López@o2.com"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Pilar.López@o2.com</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">, </span><a href="mailto:Ronan.Dunne@o2.com"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Ronan.Dunne@o2.com</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">, </span><a href="mailto:Trevor.Healy@o2.com"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Trevor.Healy@o2.com</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">, Kate </span><a href="mailto:Jarvis@o2.com"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Jarvis@o2.com</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">, </span><a href="mailto:Simon.Linares@o2.com"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Simon.Linares@o2.com</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">, </span><a href="mailto:Richard.Poston@o2.com"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Richard.Poston@o2.com</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">, </span><a href="mailto:René.Schuster@o2.com"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">René.Schuster@o2.com</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">, </span><a href="mailto:Stephen.Shurrock@o2.com"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Stephen.Shurrock@o2.com</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">, </span><a href="mailto:David.Arculus@o2.com"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">David.Arculus@o2.com</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">, </span><a href="mailto:Peter.Erskine@o2.com"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Peter.Erskine@o2.com</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">, </span><a href="mailto:Cath.Keers@o2.com"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Cath.Keers@o2.com</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">, </span><a href="mailto:Eduardo.Zaplana@o2.com"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Eduardo.Zaplana@o2.com</span></a>Sociopathic Revelationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11208852529333617263noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3293615280794164091.post-70766433817036379542012-12-12T20:53:00.004-08:002012-12-12T22:54:55.224-08:00The Black Pill On How Men Are Rejected More Than Women<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">I would like to direct your attention to a recent post by The Black Pill titled <i>Men Get Rejected More Than Women by Any Metric.</i></span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<a href="http://omegavirginrevolt.wordpress.com/2012/12/01/men-get-rejected-more-than-women-by-any-metric/"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">http://omegavirginrevolt.wordpress.com/2012/12/01/men-get-rejected-more-than-women-by-any-metric/</span></a><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">BP is correct about how men largely face rejection far more than women. Men still do much of the asking out, women generally don't---unless you are some perceived alpha that other women are tripping over themselves to date/have sex/have a relationship with. Women will often go after what other women want; the goal of getting a man that other women desire is no exception. Regardless of his worth, a man who as a potential harem of sorts has women after him because other women value him.</span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">But this is not common at all. Even so-called liberated women will often expect men to initiate and face rejection. Hypergamy is a subject that comes up on many MGTOW boards and videos; women that claim they want equality can be summed up by their hypocrisy by a couple of things; desiring to get a higher status man, and expecting men to do the work gaining her approval while she has veto power. By having this choice, it shunts the onus onto men while women do not have to face the pain of rejection; they are in the driver's seat, while men have to sink or swim. The righteousness in this dynamic is frustrating; women can be petty and nitpick about the dumbest crap in mate selection while not sharing the same level of approval winning.</span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">In reality, many (if not most) women take rejection worse than men. Men have to inure themselves to it; hell hath no fury like a woman scorned. </span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Let's face it. Despite complaints to the contrary, even women of subpar physical looks, low-paying jobs, and other flaws can snatch a man far easier than a man in the same equivalence. Hell, even a man of higher attributes often have difficulty in dating and attracting a suitable mate. Women typically do not date/marry down as much, while men are supposed to demonstrate clemency to women that are of lesser socioeconomic status as them. </span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Since women have a better time attracting men, many believe that men can pick up women with the same ease and frequency. This is nonsense; men have to prove themselves far more unless they are at the top of the heap. There are women who complain about the quality of men out there, but they are usually focusing on a narrow spectrum of men. Even a recent article stated that anyone outside of being white collar are "non-negotiable" as far as dates are concerned---they are not dating material these pseudo-elist women mentioned in the post. Nevermind that many blue collar men can make good money, but I digress.</span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Looking into it further, the typical moaning and bitching often includes that men aren't even "manning up" to improve themselves and make themselves more potentially good date/mate material. Of course, there are women who decry that men will not take up their responsibilities. When Western culture is swimming in misandry, it's not too hard to understand why men will not "man up" in first place. When being loyal, honorable, honest, hard-working, genteel, and generous is not mutually rewarded or even outright exploited, a man seeing clearly will wise up. </span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">This is evident with the dating scene as well. The cards are stacked against men, and there are women who will not give up their social and personal power so easily . . . even if it harms them in the short term. They are refusing to accept that there are men who will not let their own self-respect dwindle or be used in the dating process while sweety wants to reap the rewards. If some sort of mutual equity was widespread, it would be different, but it is not the environment we observe now.</span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">A good friend of mine summed up things nicely, although he was speaking about the workplace when he was getting the brunt of crap jobs and lost much of his motivation when he knew it was a losing battle to hold on to his job at the time: <i>If you don't care, why should I. </i>There are women out there that do not want to understand this about men, and will continue to blunder and largely blame men while living in denial about what is actually happening. </span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Over the years, the shaming language loses it effect, and the women that are upset that men would rather play an X-Box in their thirties or keep their money for retirement. Women need acknowledge why this is more common rather than remaining smug and single (all the while still thinking about men at every turn). In the mating dance, even with the dating scene, it's not being intimidated by a "strong, independent" woman that stops men from approaching/making the first move. Those same men are tired of running the gauntlet for little result, disappointed by the arbitrary whims, never being good enough, and the exhaustive and trivial lists judgmental women draw up for them. And who can blame them? </span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">This post was made under the influence of Hexvessel, Blood Ceremony, Lycia, and, of course, Black Sabbath. All bands I can't get enough of, if anyone is wondering.</span>Sociopathic Revelationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11208852529333617263noreply@blogger.com9tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3293615280794164091.post-6922007926606292012-09-09T00:48:00.004-07:002012-09-09T00:49:07.467-07:00Non Serviam <span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">I was thinking about a gal I had a relationship with years ago that I'll dub as "Amy" here. I shared a few thoughts with a good friend and his wife while talking about women I dated over the years, and why my proverbial red flag radar was now permanently up. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">I have never married, and will for all of my life never take the plunge and tie the knot with an Ameriskank. I do proudly state that. I could say marriage is for suckers and leave it at that, but over the years watching marriages either turn sour or gradually unravel made me cold. As a youth, I swore that if I ever made serious vows to one woman I would devote myself to someone worthwhile. Obviously, that woman never arrived, and I did not want to make the same mistakes I saw in either marital "bliss" turned to failure, or those marriages tattered and worn. None are perfect, but there you go.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Over time, I've seen Ameriskank behavior has gotten worse. Granted, I am from the <em>women are women</em> camp, but variances, cultural decay, and memes do make a difference. It's not a matter of, "You haven't found the right woman yet"---which mostly comes from women who believe they mean well. NAWALT aside for a moment, even someone with similar, complementary attributes has not shown me consideration in the long haul. And I am done with hearing that's all our fault for not attracting the rights ones, especially in an era of rampant hypergamy. Just looking at the dating pool a(s of late) would have filled me with dread when I was a romantic teen. It's a source for my grim aloof demeanor, and even though I'm not a complete introvert, it has turned me into a distant cynic.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Amy, of course, was the final nail in the coffin. I dated her for the longest time, because I believed she was making progress with herself. She even wanted to prove herself worthy to me, something that had not always happened in a while with my foibles</span><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> with women in the past. It was impressive at first, and she was fairly attractive and affectionate during our first year together. It was almost like we were married, and when everything went grey---and then ugly in the last four months---it was also like a soiled marriage ending in wreckage. And Amy treated it as such. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">It was hard to tell who the "real" Amy was; either a warm and almost bubby, voluptuous, girly-girl like woman . . . that would become a brooding, quick to anger spoiled brat that would get drunk and stoned while making various threats. It was to the point where I thought I would have to literally restrain her during her worse bouts. Considering that if the cops were called on us, I'm sure I would be the one arrested despite being on the physical defense. Amy pushed and emotionally bullied, and I stood my ground as she resented me. She resented me for not being a pushover and independent, the very qualities she was attracted her to me in the first place. I was her alpha with bad boyish appeal. Now I was her nemesis because I would not bow down on hand and knee. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Her idea, eventually, was to domesticate me---but what that really entailed was to lick her self-inflicted wounds, be a lap dog, and a sounding board. Before, for the longest time, I was respected and even rather lionized. When it slowly came to the fore that she wanted a man that was part pack</span> <span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">mule, part counselor, I became disgusted and upset. She knew way beforehand what I was like, and that it would not make me happy in a relationship whatsoever. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">I swore a covenant to myself that I would never seriously get involved with an "Amy" again. I did date. I had FWB situations. But anyone who reassembled her was immediately passed up.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">It has come to the point where I really believe that Ameriskanks feel like their self-entitlement includes that men have to feel happy to succor to them---although we dare not look like we are kow towing too much. If all men are dogs to a skank, kicking a lowly dog for misbehavior and watching it cower even more is weakness in their minds. Yet, on the converse, a dog who snarls back after continued abuse is somehow a dangerous threat. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Ameriskanks know very little balance in relationships towards men, it is often close to an all or nothing affair. It has often been stated a truly healthy man ready for a commitment is neither Caspar Milquetoast or a brute, but since AWs make poor decisions in mate selection (and blame men often for the blunders and ruination of a pairing, anyway), an AW will rarely heed for what is good for them in men. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">And it's little surprising when they find more men are not willing to submit to the act of marriage. By its very action, kneeling and presenting a wedding ring is a sign of submission; it is a man yielding, even giving up his freedom in a symbolic and very real sense. It makes it even more precarious and ominous in light of the fact women have the power of the state to decimate what a man ha</span><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">s built with her over the years. Don't even get me started about accusations and custody battles. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">There are a growing number of us not being happy <em>at all </em>with the AW desire to have the veto power above men <em>sans</em> accountability, and it is to their own damn determent that they refuse to acknowledge this and the societal implications. </span><br />
<br />Sociopathic Revelationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11208852529333617263noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3293615280794164091.post-5469661133797526432012-06-28T01:37:00.002-07:002012-06-28T01:37:32.543-07:00Something To Ponder<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">There's been a glut of articles about how men are anything from child-men to the erroneous charge that men are finished, and among much of the muck and blather that has raised its ugly scathing head, it seems that a fact gets lost in the maelstrom that never is on the forefront of women's minds.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Someone along the line, men's wants and needs have seemingly become irrelevant. From a MGTOW perspective, many see that Western society caters to women ceaselessly at everyone's expense, and the feminist lie that patriarchy controls women at every turn seems just that: a lie. Even men have argued on various videos that traditional women still demand men as beasts of burden and take advantage of both license and protectionism. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">With all of this, someone has forgotten to ask what makes men truly happy. It is as if we are supposed to fill those roles of protector and provider without complaint, no matter how much misandry we have to wade through . . . or that those roles could be still damned by a vindictive bitch with a ravenous lawyer and false accusations. Hell, when a man does actually follow the beat of his own drum, he's called anything from creep, gay, loser, child-man, and even more vile barbs have been spat forth.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">All the legal traps and social malaise aside, I made an offhand comment the other day that I wanted to focus more on----it seems so many women want to make themselves less interesting and even repulsive to men than ever, and yet somehow we are supposed to still offer unconditional love to them at the end of the day. Only a deluded fool or masochist would dream of such rotten bargain, and yet when men balk at it---for pretty damn good reasons---we are dubbed as anything from bitter to even possibly dangerous. It's pathetic. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Men's happiness----and their insistence on rational self-interest---is seen as antithetical to the whims of women, and the cries of asshole and misogynist abound. But as society might, when discovering men's real motives, it would be hard pressed to blame us for resorting to such a stance. But it does. Constantly. We are viewed as guilty as charged. It's damned if we do, damned if we don't. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">There's a plethora of reasons why men concur with a MGTOW mentality. But what is curious is that women do not think men's happiness is paramount . . . or even an issue. When men start to deeply mistrust a woman that they would willing find solace in her arms with, and that does not abate, more women are apt to find men that "won't commit" but still remain clueless about it.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">They remand clueless, because they don't realize their behavior is part of the cause. Without serious self-examination, there are women that spend a good portion of their lives fouling up what could be a deep, profound bond between the sexes. When they tire of the drama and conflict (often self-created), it's typically too late. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">It's my belief women are inclined to be, well, <i>women</i>, but at the same time are quite capable of change and being the agents of adapting. The big question is thus: will they ever treat men's happiness as anything of import? Will they espect men as much as they expect it in turn? On one hand, I believe it is quite possible; however, it remains to be seen. Perhaps they will only bother when enough men tire of the emotional games, power trips, and toxic relationships. After all, despite feminist myths to the contrary, many women have benefited from both traditionalism and "equality," and they aren't prone to give up their own privileges any time soon. </span>Sociopathic Revelationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11208852529333617263noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3293615280794164091.post-78956062515951259312012-06-19T07:30:00.002-07:002012-06-19T07:32:11.039-07:00Succinct, Yet So True . . . Zorro Speaks Up<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">This was taken from The Spearhead, if anyone was wondering. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Zorro June 16, 2012 at 13:29</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<blockquote>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Considering the way our culture is diving into the Estrogen Swamp, the only way a man can remain a man is to keep his hands clear of wedding rings.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Great job, fembots. You’re creating a society where the only man women will want is a man who will not want women.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">You idiots.</span><br />
</blockquote>
<br />
<br />
<br />Sociopathic Revelationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11208852529333617263noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3293615280794164091.post-24833853482027465702012-06-19T07:27:00.003-07:002012-06-19T07:27:31.540-07:00I Wanted to Say A Belated Happy . . ..<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> . . Father's Day for all the fathers out there, and also that I have had the luck to spend time with my own father---who despite his problems as managed to live to a ripe old age. I very grateful to be able to see him when I can.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Cheers! SR</span>Sociopathic Revelationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11208852529333617263noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3293615280794164091.post-32599114629446640982012-04-30T03:02:00.001-07:002012-04-30T03:15:46.118-07:00Dismantling The Nice Guy Stigma, Notes About MRA+, and Gaming And Intimacy<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">I think the idea of the "Nice Guy Syndrome" has to be revamped, especially when dealing with feminists.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">I lurked on a blog which there was rather extensive discussion about it. It's a fairly trafficked feminist one with an OP that has made quite a name for herself, including not apologizing for attaching stigma to white men she blasted years ago. It's curious has to why exactly she feels the need to perpetuate the nice guy mythic nonsense. Of course, she's a towering moralist so she's above the very subject she claims righteous indignance. But being a feminist, that's a given.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">It was also worthy of note the virtually all of the posters blamed the "nice guys" they interacted with were at fault for their own behaviors. Nevermind these same feminists attested quite many experiences with them. Give me break; if they detest the mentality so much, perhaps shunning them would be in order if possible. Is this an option they would rather not eschew?</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Also don't even bother to think for a moment that these women are capable of the traits they state they abhor. They are, but will not readily admit it even under pressure. This includes passive-aggressiveness, selfishness, ulterior motives, self-entitlement, and even feeling scorned if not expecting the sex they want at command. It's quite concurrent with Ameriskank behavior. Too bad they largely refused to see their own projection of those attributes themselves. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">If they were so adamant about not rewarding "nice guys," they would procure not even dating them in their personal lives. Before anyone accuses me of hypocrisy, if I continued to date clear cut Ameriskanks and got burned over and over, I wouldn't expect a lot of sympathy once I woke up to the fact my attraction was part of the problem <i>and did nothing to curtail it</i>. These same feminists don't bother to proclaim they are rewarding those same men they bitch bitterly about. Again. And again. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">I'm sure they believe they are the better half of their foibles concerning their toxic relationships. They are egregious liars.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">***</span></div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">I think the term "nice guy" should be laid to rest. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">It's intriguing how everyone believes they aren't, or don't want to be perceived as such. Granted, I think that the expression should be purged and another take its place; one that would describe certain levels of traits that can be identified. Social introversion isn't a handicap or synonymous with dysfunction per se; it has some aspects it can be positive or self-defensive (such as avoiding toxic relationships), but so many people seem to get the term confused. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Not to mention the moronic pseudo-adage, "Nice guys aren't really nice guys anyway." Okay . . . you towering moral bastion of feminist morality---ahem, to pardon the phase---nice try. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">It's often employed as an excuse to gravitate towards creeps and cads. And treat good men like shit. It's truly a pathetic rationalization. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Contrary to common belief, you push a man against the ropes enough, even all but the most Caspar Milquetoast of men will come out (proverbially speaking, at least) swinging. It's human nature. It's inevitable. Men have a large capacity to take a good heap of dung they shouldn't without much complaint (as women think they do often). But some people have more sensitive triggers than others, and saying and doing anything and expecting a man to take abuse as a "real man" is the hubris of fools, masochists, fake alphas, and, of course, feminists.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">The stunning conceit of an Ameriskank is thus: "I can get away with anything I want with a nice guy, he should be a real man and take his lumps and not bitch too much and still cherish me." </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">By dubbing someone as an average frustrated chump or nice guy---in the negative sense that many utilize---people categorize someone in a confining box and give excuses to treat them as such. And they are surprised when that same labelled man defies expectation or protests being a doormat. Suddenly, he's a royal prick when he's not ripe for personal (or other types) of exploitation. And yet the social perps who treat a man as such get dumbfounded and pissed because men refuse to conform to the false dichotomy of nice guy/bad boy, and clearly don't want to acknowledge that they created the problem in the first place.</span><br />
<div style="text-align: -webkit-auto;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">***</span></div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">There has been some heated debate about MRA+ and how men can possibly find real love despite the pitfalls and dreaded landscape of US relationships, whether it be casual dating up to marriage and family. I ultimately believe that it is the choice of each man whether or not he engages women---and what type of woman he desires and the nature of his relationship to that said woman. Men who choose not to involve themselves with women should never be shamed or stigmatized; it is obvious that there exists risks for men dating US women and I don't have to craft a list for many to understand that point. But it is not my position to belittle those who seek the depth of a profound bond.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Unfortunately, most men---myself included---grew up with an idealized conception of what their mate was going to be like. And had their hopes dashed and crushed again and again. By leading men down the primrose path and not providing them with a grounded sense of realism and what women can be like is anything from naive to irresponsible. There are quite a good percentage of them that are reproductive opportunists; even <i>irrational</i> self-interest in a woman is still self-interest. Men who are practicing rational self-interested are often viewed as selfish misogynists; a woman doing the same is pragmatic and smart.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">For the longest time, I pined for my own Kate Beckinsale, a woman who possessed a set of qualities so many women profess they generally have without feeling a need to demonstrate them very much. Even those who are not starry-eyed dreamers will wax that if I don't believe in it somehow, it will never happen no matter what the odds. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Trouble is, I actually <i>did</i> believe I had a soulmate that would fulfill my desire for a deep companionship. It took some doing, but after a time I awoke from that dream. I cannot tell you enough how painful and even traumatic it was in the process---I made it on the other side, although I'm not entirely unscathed.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Even seeking the equivalent in a mate is exceedingly difficult as a realist; and as a man you are typically blamed if you don't attract the right women---even if you avoid the bad and walking damaged for a legitimate female cohort.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br />It is for the better I no longer buy into the feminine mystique and peer behind the veil; I honestly believe this wonderment was one of the main factors why a good friend of mine slowly drank himself to death. Granted, it was one of a few core elements, but it was obvious to myself. After the second break up of the only woman he openly declared his love for, he went into a such a bout of heavy drinking and depression he almost died two years before his actual passing. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">It is truly up to us to educate ourselves on the nature of the female dark side, feminism, and Ameriskank behavior and spread the word. Men have been living under the lie of how without women they are nothing; we have to smash this modern myth like Thor wielding his Mjolnir hammer with a calculated fury.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">***</span></div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Zed/Zenpriest has stated something profound about gaming a future wife or one in practice; if one feels the need to constantly employ player tactics to gain the upper hand with a spouse, you will never feel true intimacy.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">There's a lot to be said about that. I'm not as overtly critical of pick up artistry all the time, but "game" has little answer to obtaining real trust and intimacy with someone you must constantly game in order to dominate and lead. If you are not in the position to steer naturally and have to employ a set of manipulations to keep personal power going, it is not exactly a happy situation and can even lead to resentment and mistrust. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">If you have to game your wife so she doesn't move on to the bigger, better deal or gradually steamroll you, you don't have a marriage that is wholly sound. It's just a matter of fact.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Trust is vital to any <i>healthy</i> relationship. Many relationships aren't always short-lived, but those that don't have trust as a cornerstone are certainly strained to begin with. In all seriousness, those who practice game may have some answer that could help, but I haven't seen one outstanding one that would work in a satisfactory manner. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">If one wishes to have that deep bond between husband and wife, brinkmanship should not be an overriding portion of it. Sadly, even in marital situations where gaming hasn't been known, it's often present as well.</span> <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: verdana, arial, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12px; line-height: 18px;"><br /></span></span></div>Sociopathic Revelationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11208852529333617263noreply@blogger.com8tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3293615280794164091.post-30312015023739342352012-04-28T23:55:00.000-07:002012-04-28T23:58:52.525-07:00Revolt<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">One of the things I've been ruminating about on my vocation has been a topic that has captured my attention for some time---male disposability. Despite what occurred with the Costa Concordia (which I believe is not the only incidence of apparent lack of selflessness on men's behalf for women) there has been a strain of belief even in the MRM that most men are somehow hapless in a sense regarding protecting and providing for women. It's ingrained in us, it's in evolutionary psychological make up of men, it's in our DNA.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Argue as many might attest to this, it's obviously not completely set in stone. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">I do believe that our Western culture amps men's alleged "drive" to engage in self-sacrifice not just because of civilization's sake; it's because someone is benefiting and even exploiting a huge percentage of men. Whatever belief system you come from perspective-wise, clearly there are forces out that that are pretty darn insecure about men losing faith and trust in society and the tenuous pact between men and women. Now days, our culture wants women to be supported no matter what foibles and failures they engage in; if men don't comply, the state will, although the state often garners financial and the toil of men by "legalized" extortion. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">We're supposed to be content with being model beta males, and if we don't like it, it's tough shit---even if we are given nothing return. This is not the most healthy condition, obviously.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Men's interests and needs are always at a backseat, if salient at all. We're supposed to be happy being fem-serfs (although so many women incessantly seem to be happy at being unhappy) and not place our happiness first. A man that does strive to carve is own path is somehow seen from anything to useless or a pariah. He's a narcissistic jerk even if he's not intentionally harming someone else. Shame and even vile contempt are often heaped upon men who break ranks and even question why men should ultimately appease your modern Ameriskank; nevermind parasitical sociopaths that are no good for society get admiration by the truckloads---that are<i> at </i>or<i> near </i>the apex of popularity---and are rewarded by so many women who are eager to even be in a harem of sorts with them. And, of course, the rest of us have to scramble for the leftovers or don't have a good mate to spare. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">If you don't kow tow, you're a self-centered, misogynist asshole. Hell, there are some women online practically screaming it and demonizing any man that they deem as such.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">If men really understood the biases and embitterment against them <i>and let it sink it permanently</i>, the landscape of the dynamic of between the sexes would be very, very different. It truly terrifies women if men were to stop self-sacrifice and expect women to own up. Real, raw equality is something that very few women can rise to the challenge and uphold. While there are no hard and fast rules for MGTOW, I do believe there is a strong, deep undercurrent that is the root of men's rights issues---acknowledged or not---that more men are gradually perturbed by being perceived and treated as second class citizens and are waking up to that fact. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br />And no, "bitter" or not, it goes deeper than not getting a date for a time or just not looking like the cool metrosexual Ameriskanks claim they want. It cuts to the core of our souls, and it's surprising that more men aren't downright furious about it. Feminists have no idea how much men show restraint and control in this aspect; we are not given merit points or anything of the sort, and no matter how much scorn and abuse are lobbed at us, we are supposed to be still loving and forgiving at the end of the day. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Whatever the reason, there are people who have an awful time of seeing men as human beings rather than just human doings. The irony is that feminism has been stated as the belief that women are people, too. This is hogwash; feminism was (and is) about female supremacy and having women possess ultimate say-so on anything to legalities to sexual intimacy; somewhere along the line men's priorities were not of import. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Now, I do think it will come to pass that men will have to be viewed as people, too, regardless if feminists and their cohorts like or not. Perhaps it will not be in my life time, but the meme is out and about, and no amount of politically correct brainwashing or grooming men to be white knights will dampen the word.</span>Sociopathic Revelationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11208852529333617263noreply@blogger.com6tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3293615280794164091.post-52095654583733187902012-03-28T00:19:00.000-07:002012-03-28T00:57:38.046-07:00It's Truly Lamentable, It Really Is . . .<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">From the spirit runs poison, and the wheel of</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Fortune is ever still,</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Sweeter than the light, the darkness of your soul,</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Immaculate, deception.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Something has touched, the spirit inside,</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Once there was love now there's a void.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Nights of deception, ghosts in my mind,</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Am I bewitched, slave to desire.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">It's knowing that times keeps rolling on, night after</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Day, day after night,</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">It's knowing that feeling of coming home, to where</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">My spirit lies.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">"Immaculate Deception"---Black Sabbath</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">The curious thing is that as I grow older I don't feel the need so much for companionship. Sure, I lament that feminism, as well as certain factors have made things highly difficult for men to find a truly decent partner and I certainly don't dismiss the pain from that---notice I didn't employ the word "frustration," it implies that the yearning so many men feel for a woman that would stand beside (them regardless of what happened) is trivial, when it's certainly not. It truly is a deep human need to desire a profound bond with the opposite sex, and so many sources seem to make it trite when men express it while thwarted, as if it's always their fault. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Of course, if a woman can't find a man and desires to have one, it's not her fault. There's no good men out there, right? </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">And after all, withholding affection, acting superior <i>sans</i> merit, lack of human decency---and even being callous and emotionally cruel---are more hallmarks of Ameriskank breed. It's a way of control and passive-aggressive dominance. If men returned the favor in kind, they would have a pulmonary infraction. Men desire to be with women, and despite the fact women have a level of desire for men, the malignant maze that is erected in order to obtain affection could make one question why men have to "earn" something women just should receive bountifully because of their gender. Men have been subjected to such misandry to view themselves as lesser than women, and that will be never be good enough for what Warren Farrell dubbed as the "genetic celebrity." And Ameriskanks believe that they <i>are</i> that genetic celebrity by simple virtue of their vagina, even though very few will look remotely like Monica Bellucci when they are her age. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Not that I don't think about it time and again. When I was a teen and a hopeless romantic, I found even then that one could cry to the heavens for love and receive nothing. Now that I'm a doer more than a dreamer, the shine that our culture regards the feminine mystique has turned lackluster. It's been said before, but very few women really love and respect men for what they are. We truly are a means to an end, and if we treated women with the same behavior it would be deemed exploitative and selfish. I can visualize women having serious breakdowns when men have conditioned themselves against the same. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Even more troubling is how men's issues are viewed as trite compared to the smallest whims and fancy if a woman. Our society, in this aspect, is guilty as charged. If it was the opposite----men's needs trumping women's every time---I could see why feminists would protest and have a legitimate gripe, but it's far from the truth and proof our culture smacks of a matriarchy with the external trappings of patriarchy. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">It's also been said that men don't just look for relationships just for sex. Some do, but many are looking for that very love, respect, comfort, and admiration that just doesn't seem to be happening so much. If you are a sensitive man and long to show yourself openly, flaws and all, expecting kindness and warmth in the arms of a woman is a mistake; you are going to eventually have a rude awakening. Not to mention that a really sensitive man would be upset at continued mistreatment and the experience that he is not on par with the woman he is interacting with. An Ameriskank cannot possibly have this because she must have the upper hand no matter how she would be resentful of a man that isn't the leader. Hence their cognitive dissonance concerning men; despite being attracted to alpha traits, they disapprove of men taking the lead because of feminism and perceived "inequality." But a man that will acquiesce is a doormat, a pushover. A dull beta male. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">As a youth, there was a period where I found little solace in many things and would have given a welcome relief if a young woman had been even mildly supportive. I let that go by the wayside even with a couple of serious relationships. Despite what anyone has told you, Ameriskanks despise "weakness" (i.e. kindness and empathy) in men because it would mean that they would have to see us as truly human beings rather than second class citizens. Or worse. One could argue it is an extension of an Ameriskank's own self-loathing; treating a man has fully human and a deep well would mean that perhaps her vain illusion of her own superiority (in a culture that constantly polishes her bloated ego) would shatter . . . and she would have to re-evaluate her own self-worth and deal with her inner anger.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">At the beginning of my post I mentioned I don't concern myself with being with a woman in the long haul. I still wish something good could have happened between myself and a decent woman, but I don't waste time wishing upon a star. I have to live my life, and hope springs eternal. Even finding someone roughly equivalent seems improbable. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">The really damning thing is that men like me are "dangerous" in some sense, but not in the way feminists want to portray us. We stand up for ourselves, do activity in our own circles, and while societal demands us to be slavishly obligated to women without reward, the more it does so, the more we push away. This is truly frightening to those are championing their lie of being strong and independent while ever being resentful of the fact they can no longer use a man who's eyes have been opened. They condemned good men as boring and useless, once they truly need us we will give them what they really deserve . . . even if it is nothing but scorn and silence. I truly believe that given the chance most men would be loving and compassionate with women, but after a large part of a lifetime of embittered male-bashing and resistance, why are they still surprised when men opt out? </span><br />
<br />Sociopathic Revelationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11208852529333617263noreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3293615280794164091.post-58851888731092703942012-02-10T08:17:00.000-08:002012-02-11T07:02:10.738-08:00The Costa Concordia; Chivalry's Corpse, and Men and Self-Sacrifice<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">A while back, MarkMark had a <a href="http://markymarksthoughts.blogspot.com/2012/01/costa-concordia-equality.html">post</a> on the Costa Cordordia ship disaster and a poster named Ping Jockey had had this to say:</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">This has shown them something that they hadn't planned on -- that men are fed up with their hypergamy, solopsism and </span><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">entitlement attitudes, and are becoming more indifferent to them and don't really care about what happens to them. (Witness </span><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">the recent articles about the concern of some women about the growth of MGTOW and growing male indifference to women. The </span><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">getting scared about what could happen when enough "Good Men" become totally indifferent to them and their interests.)</span><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">It's been said that women's greatest nightmare is not men's hate, but men's indifference -- because it is only the concern of Good Men" about women that protects women against the depredations of "Bad Men". When women lose that concern, they have a LOT to fear.</span><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Based upon what has happened in this incident, I have a feeling that the next large accident or disaster where women are thrown upon their own resources without government intervention, protection or assistance is going to be VERY, VERY interesting indeed!</span></blockquote>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Much could be said about the phenomenon on the ship and the heavy-handed articles that followed. Not surprisingly, there was an outcry about the alleged selfishness and shamelessness about the men who clamored to protect themselves first---women be damned. Even (so-called) conservatives demonstrated their hypocritical true colors on this issue---it's okay for women to have equal rights, but when it comes to self-sacrifice, especially in a dire circumstance, men have to be expendable. I wonder if these same people would do the same; I have a distinct feeling that they would not. I would bet even a few sell their own mothers to save their own skins, yet have the stunning audacity to imply that men who do not abide by the (fairly modern, by the way) </span><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">quasi-dictum of "women and children first."</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">It was the same message. Women can have their cake and eat it, too, and glean the benefits of both "equality" and the protections that traditionalism yields. Men have to bear the brunt of societal situations that call for it---whether we let it or not. And if we don't like it, we are heartless, misogynist bastards to boot. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">I have had a rather passing interest in how organisms survive despite environmental stressors and conditions, and human beings are on the apex of that list. Do men really have a genetic proclivity be the ones who are willing to sacrifice their very lives more than women when needed? At first observation, it seems to be the case. Superficially, at least. After all, it was all part and parcel of the order of things, and Western culture hinged on this bedrock of sorts . . . right?</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">After many years of witnessing what had happened to other men---and not just myself---and even possessing a keen sense of </span><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">self-preservation despite societal attempts to dampen it, whatever left of that attribute of self-sacrifice is now numbed. </span><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> I became disgusted by with a misandrist culture that exalts women at the expense </span><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">of men. I viewed self-abnegation as no virtue whatsoever, and getting rid of traces of it became far easier over time. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">While much has been debated about how true sociobiological drives are truly involved in this or not, there has sprung up more examples that if this somehow has some biological fact, it can be overridden. Even more so, it can be changed in the long term. Feminism is quite the culprit. Despite the concept that feminism is all about equality, it never was whatsoever. One its latent---but very powerful and ingrained---thrusts of feminism is that men are here to ultimately serve men. If we do not in some fashion, we are not just considered useless, but even possibly dangerous in some manner.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">I've always thought that as a man that a woman by my side would make rational self-interest one of the main roots of our relationship. It would be paired with a mutual understanding and trust that would serve us both. This is not just from my experience alone, but I have discovered that there are women out there that refuse to grasp this as a concept, much less in practice. So many expect men to love them unconditionally while they walk all over them; they expect men to work soulless jobs and not complain while women discover themselves and dump men on a whim. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">On top of this, they've gotten Betty Friedan's disease; forever happy being unhappy, and what "beta males" do for them is never enough while rewarding the perceived alphas ceaselessly. Even women who believe themselves loyal engage in shameless hypergamy. Of course, men are supposed to accept all of this, and when we don't there are women out there who express shock and anger when we don't "know our role." My retort to them is thus; what the hell do you expect? </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">There are lessons from the Costa Concordia disaster. This is where Ping Jockey's post comes into play here, and his statement has been concurrent with one of my themes for MGTOW; women have a lot to fear when good men show indifference or turn their backs on them---or decide the alternatives---foreign women, minority women, expating, womanizing, engaging in semi-reclusive modes, or simply waiting it out until a better woman comes along. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Deep down, it is an absolutely terrifying thought that men can up and leave any time a woman that gets too out of hand and abusive. It should be, but the intriguing thing is that so many women still do the wrong actions and behavior that do not make men more willing to make it a go. This is far more dangerous and still alien for many women, who would rather risk a known evil in a man who is corrupt and brute than compassionate and tender. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">When Ameriskanks smashed the social compact between men and women, the old role of man-as-pack-mule gradually become more of a source of drudgery rather than pride. As much as I detest feminism, there is a good thing that has come out of it; if women do not obligate themselves to men in a fashion, men need not, either, and we are freed up to seek out what our true bliss. Whether or not American women will get the hint and decide to grow and learn with men or still mournfully cry out for the "traditional" roles they damned in the first place </span><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">remains to be seen. </span>Sociopathic Revelationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11208852529333617263noreply@blogger.com9